use of old railway tunnels

This forum is for the discussion of all railway subjects that do not include the LNER, and its constituent companies.

Moderators: 52D, Tom F, Rlangham, Atlantic 3279, Blink Bonny, Saint Johnstoun, richard

Post Reply
User avatar
Kestrel
NER C7 4-4-2
Posts: 899
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2011 1:13 am

use of old railway tunnels

Post by Kestrel »

Boris
GER D14 4-4-0 'Claud Hamilton'
Posts: 381
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 5:00 pm
Location: leeds
Contact:

Re: use of old railway tunnels

Post by Boris »

So thats another line taken over by cyclists that will never see rails again
EX DARNALL 39B FIREMAN 1947-55
User avatar
Rlangham
LNER P2 2-8-2
Posts: 916
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2005 2:52 pm
Location: GWR Territory
Contact:

Re: use of old railway tunnels

Post by Rlangham »

Highly doubt the S&D will be rebuilt anyway, despite the best intentions of at least one preservation group down there
Author of 'The North Eastern Railway in the First World War' - now available in paperback!

http://www.amazon.co.uk/North-Eastern-R ... 781554552/

Happy to help with anything relating to the railways in the First World War, just ask
Wavey
LNER J39 0-6-0
Posts: 165
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 3:09 pm

Re: use of old railway tunnels

Post by Wavey »

Boris wrote:So thats another line taken over by cyclists that will never see rails again


Whilst I disagree with some of Sustrans policies and the way that they have been obstructive to some potential heritage rail developments, surely it can only be good that they have taken over the upkeep of major items of rail infrastructure that would otherwise decay and have to be demolished?
User avatar
sawdust
GCR D11 4-4-0 'Improved Director'
Posts: 423
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 7:27 pm
Location: North Yorkshire

Re: use of old railway tunnels

Post by sawdust »

Wavey wrote:
Boris wrote:So thats another line taken over by cyclists that will never see rails again


Whilst I disagree with some of Sustrans policies and the way that they have been obstructive to some potential heritage rail developments, surely it can only be good that they have taken over the upkeep of major items of rail infrastructure that would otherwise decay and have to be demolished?
The most extreme example of this I've seen is on the Pateley Bridge branch where a section of embankment near Ripley was put back after it had been illegally removed by a neighbour.

Sawdust.
PinzaC55
LNER A3 4-6-2
Posts: 1381
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 2:36 pm

Re: use of old railway tunnels

Post by PinzaC55 »

Wavey wrote:
Boris wrote:So thats another line taken over by cyclists that will never see rails again


Whilst I disagree with some of Sustrans policies and the way that they have been obstructive to some potential heritage rail developments, surely it can only be good that they have taken over the upkeep of major items of rail infrastructure that would otherwise decay and have to be demolished?
True but you have to wonder what the Midsomer Norton group could have done with that £4 million and what return in terms of tourism they would have produced?
User avatar
sawdust
GCR D11 4-4-0 'Improved Director'
Posts: 423
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 7:27 pm
Location: North Yorkshire

Re: use of old railway tunnels

Post by sawdust »

The heritage movement needs to be better at lobbying. It needs to get across its contribution to the economy, not only in terms of tourism. But also how much is spent in the engineering, manufacturing and other sectors.

Sawdust.
PinzaC55
LNER A3 4-6-2
Posts: 1381
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 2:36 pm

Re: use of old railway tunnels

Post by PinzaC55 »

sawdust wrote:The heritage movement needs to be better at lobbying. It needs to get across its contribution to the economy, not only in terms of tourism. But also how much is spent in the engineering, manufacturing and other sectors.

Sawdust.
It would never get this money though. The cycle routes thing is driven by political ideology, ie the need of councils and local authorities to be seen "doing something for the environment" and helping people keep fit.
Coboman
GCR O4 2-8-0 'ROD'
Posts: 510
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 4:23 am
Location: GNR outpost

Re: use of old railway tunnels

Post by Coboman »

How many more preserved railways can the market stand though? There got to be a limit before existing ones are affected.
Its good to know where you stand. Saves making a fool of yourself later......
User avatar
Rlangham
LNER P2 2-8-2
Posts: 916
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2005 2:52 pm
Location: GWR Territory
Contact:

Re: use of old railway tunnels

Post by Rlangham »

I think it's probably achieved that already, and ageing volunteers may speed up the process (although that said there seems to be more and more younger volunteers on many lines) - i've visited some lines that have left me wondering why i'd bothered, especially one which previously had a great atmosphere but is now some very tatty stations and a combination of Mk 1's/Mk 2's hauled by either their one useable steam locomotive or 'heritage' diesels
Author of 'The North Eastern Railway in the First World War' - now available in paperback!

http://www.amazon.co.uk/North-Eastern-R ... 781554552/

Happy to help with anything relating to the railways in the First World War, just ask
PinzaC55
LNER A3 4-6-2
Posts: 1381
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 2:36 pm

Re: use of old railway tunnels

Post by PinzaC55 »

Coboman wrote:How many more preserved railways can the market stand though? There got to be a limit before existing ones are affected.
How many Tesco's, Sainsburies or McDonalds can the market stand? Maybe more heritage railways simply generates more business?

I live in York and the cost of rail travel has risen to the extent that it is pretty much unfeasible for me to travel like I did in the early 80's. If there are 3 railways or 33 railways in Somerset it has no effect on me.
Coboman
GCR O4 2-8-0 'ROD'
Posts: 510
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 4:23 am
Location: GNR outpost

Re: use of old railway tunnels

Post by Coboman »

Rlangham wrote:I think it's probably achieved that already, and ageing volunteers may speed up the process (although that said there seems to be more and more younger volunteers on many lines) - i've visited some lines that have left me wondering why i'd bothered, especially one which previously had a great atmosphere but is now some very tatty stations and a combination of Mk 1's/Mk 2's hauled by either their one useable steam locomotive or 'heritage' diesels
CVR by any chance?
Its good to know where you stand. Saves making a fool of yourself later......
Bryan
LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
Posts: 2224
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 6:48 pm
Location: York

Re: use of old railway tunnels

Post by Bryan »

Coboman wrote:How many more preserved railways can the market stand though? There got to be a limit before existing ones are affected.
I seem to remember comments like that back in the 70s.
Coboman
GCR O4 2-8-0 'ROD'
Posts: 510
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 4:23 am
Location: GNR outpost

Re: use of old railway tunnels

Post by Coboman »

I wasn't commenting, I was asking a question.
Its good to know where you stand. Saves making a fool of yourself later......
PinzaC55
LNER A3 4-6-2
Posts: 1381
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 2:36 pm

Re: use of old railway tunnels

Post by PinzaC55 »

Coboman wrote:I wasn't commenting, I was asking a question.
In that case the market can stand a lot more preserved railways.
Post Reply