LNER Y7 No.1310 at the Middleton Railway - 22nd April 2012
Moderators: 52D, Tom F, Rlangham, Atlantic 3279, Blink Bonny, Saint Johnstoun, richard
-
- GCR O4 2-8-0 'ROD'
- Posts: 591
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 8:46 pm
- Location: Leeds
- Contact:
LNER Y7 No.1310 at the Middleton Railway - 22nd April 2012
A couple of shots of LNER Y7 No.1310 at the Middleton Railway on the 22nd April during some sharp April showers.
Cracking little engine, well done to all involved in the restoration of the engine =]
Video Available Here
Cracking little engine, well done to all involved in the restoration of the engine =]
Video Available Here
- Blink Bonny
- LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
- Posts: 3946
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 9:21 pm
- Location: The Midlands
- Contact:
Re: LNER Y7 No.1310 at the Middleton Railway - 22nd April 20
Ay up!
She always looks to me like she's shrunk in the wash
She always looks to me like she's shrunk in the wash
If I ain't here, I'm in Bilston, scoffing decent chips at last!!!!
- 52D
- LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
- Posts: 3968
- Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 3:50 pm
- Location: Reallocated now between the Lickey and GWR
- Contact:
Re: LNER Y7 No.1310 at the Middleton Railway - 22nd April 20
A lovely little loco, ive seen both survivors in action.
Hi interested in the area served by 52D. also researching colliery wagonways from same area.
- 2002EarlMarischal
- LNER A3 4-6-2
- Posts: 1402
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 11:18 pm
- Location: Burbage
Re: LNER Y7 No.1310 at the Middleton Railway - 22nd April 20
My wife used the term "cute". I don't think I've ever heard it applied to a steam engine before!
What would the haulage capacity of a Y7 be? Could it move a pacific around a station yard for example?
What would the haulage capacity of a Y7 be? Could it move a pacific around a station yard for example?
- richard
- LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
- Posts: 3390
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 5:11 pm
- Location: Wichita Falls, Texas
- Contact:
Re: LNER Y7 No.1310 at the Middleton Railway - 22nd April 20
Yes. I have a photo in a book of either a Y7 or Y8 (I'm pretty certain it was a Y7 - the Y8 was even smaller!) with a V2 or Pacific at York.
Richard
Richard
Richard Marsden
LNER Encyclopedia
LNER Encyclopedia
- 2002EarlMarischal
- LNER A3 4-6-2
- Posts: 1402
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 11:18 pm
- Location: Burbage
Re: LNER Y7 No.1310 at the Middleton Railway - 22nd April 20
Now, that would be something to see!richard wrote:Yes. I have a photo in a book of either a Y7 or Y8 (I'm pretty certain it was a Y7 - the Y8 was even smaller!) with a V2 or Pacific at York.
Richard
The nearest I can get is this:
- richard
- LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
- Posts: 3390
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 5:11 pm
- Location: Wichita Falls, Texas
- Contact:
Re: LNER Y7 No.1310 at the Middleton Railway - 22nd April 20
Found it, it is a Y8. RCTS Locomotives of the LNER Part 9B (Q1-Z5 tank engines), Figure 108.
Caption reads "Class Y8 No. 8091 acting as shed pilot at York c.1947."
The accompanying loco is a V2 (number not visible). As with the above photo, the centre line of the Y8's boiler is just below the bottom of the V2's boiler.
For comparison, the Y7 is quoted at 25'4" over buffers and 11,041lb TE vs. the Y8's 17' 10.5" and 5999lb TE.
Ie. the Y7 had almost double the tractive effort (@ 85% cutoff) of the Y8!
Caption reads "Class Y8 No. 8091 acting as shed pilot at York c.1947."
The accompanying loco is a V2 (number not visible). As with the above photo, the centre line of the Y8's boiler is just below the bottom of the V2's boiler.
For comparison, the Y7 is quoted at 25'4" over buffers and 11,041lb TE vs. the Y8's 17' 10.5" and 5999lb TE.
Ie. the Y7 had almost double the tractive effort (@ 85% cutoff) of the Y8!
Richard Marsden
LNER Encyclopedia
LNER Encyclopedia
-
- LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
- Posts: 1729
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 3:34 pm
Re: LNER Y7 No.1310 at the Middleton Railway - 22nd April 20
You can use the tractive effort estimate to get an idea of the load a loco will move. Steam era stock needed something in the range 0.3 - 0.5% of its weight as force exerted on the drawbar to get it rolling at low speed on level track. So even 160 tons of pacific 'only' needs 0.8 ton force, thick end of 2,000lb tractive effort. Actually it needs a bit more than that, because all the engine components have to be broken out, and are then quite draggy, and even more so when the valve chests and cylinders are cold, with rings and shafts glued in place if any steam cylinder oil is around as it should be. There's also the little matter of yard track typically not being of the highest quality with sags and humps to be got over...2002EarlMarischal wrote:What would the haulage capacity of a Y7 be? Could it move a pacific around a station yard for example?
Re: LNER Y7 No.1310 at the Middleton Railway - 22nd April 20
Great video. Despite having lived in Leeds for 6 months before, and having a keen interest in NER locomotives, I've never made the trip to Middleton but hope to rectify that this year. It's also home to one of my other favourite locomotives, Sentinel 68153
Author of 'The North Eastern Railway in the First World War' - now available in paperback!
http://www.amazon.co.uk/North-Eastern-R ... 781554552/
Happy to help with anything relating to the railways in the First World War, just ask
http://www.amazon.co.uk/North-Eastern-R ... 781554552/
Happy to help with anything relating to the railways in the First World War, just ask
Re: LNER Y7 No.1310 at the Middleton Railway - 22nd April 20
Or as another example.Hatfield Shed wrote:You can use the tractive effort estimate to get an idea of the load a loco will move. Steam era stock needed something in the range 0.3 - 0.5% of its weight as force exerted on the drawbar to get it rolling at low speed on level track. So even 160 tons of pacific 'only' needs 0.8 ton force, thick end of 2,000lb tractive effort. Actually it needs a bit more than that, because all the engine components have to be broken out, and are then quite draggy, and even more so when the valve chests and cylinders are cold, with rings and shafts glued in place if any steam cylinder oil is around as it should be. There's also the little matter of yard track typically not being of the highest quality with sags and humps to be got over...2002EarlMarischal wrote:What would the haulage capacity of a Y7 be? Could it move a pacific around a station yard for example?
I have moved a Bullied pacific in Barry scrapyard initially with 2 x 5 ton tirfor jacks, once it was moving we managed to keep it going with one.
- 52D
- LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
- Posts: 3968
- Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 3:50 pm
- Location: Reallocated now between the Lickey and GWR
- Contact:
Re: LNER Y7 No.1310 at the Middleton Railway - 22nd April 20
I think the Middleton is a very underated line, one of the joys of it to me is the visitors are genuinely interested but not the type who run around trying to get the best angles etc and who get annoyed when other passengers are in the way. I have always found the staff very helpful and chatty.
You will be in for a disapointment if the Sentinel is still a kit of parts in the yard.
There is a prototype for everything as the North Sunderland used a Y7 on passenger trains from Chathill to Seahouses.
Another little gem worth looking out for at Middleton is the little Danish shunter.
You will be in for a disapointment if the Sentinel is still a kit of parts in the yard.
There is a prototype for everything as the North Sunderland used a Y7 on passenger trains from Chathill to Seahouses.
Another little gem worth looking out for at Middleton is the little Danish shunter.
Hi interested in the area served by 52D. also researching colliery wagonways from same area.
- richard
- LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
- Posts: 3390
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 5:11 pm
- Location: Wichita Falls, Texas
- Contact:
Re: LNER Y7 No.1310 at the Middleton Railway - 22nd April 20
I understand the Sentinel is now at the front of the queue - so determined work has start (or soon will start) to get it going again.
When I saw it, it was a kit of parts, although looking better than the Y7 at the time! The Sentinel boiler was elsewhere - a low priority overhaul with someone else who had a Sentinel boiler iirc.
When I saw it, it was a kit of parts, although looking better than the Y7 at the time! The Sentinel boiler was elsewhere - a low priority overhaul with someone else who had a Sentinel boiler iirc.
Richard Marsden
LNER Encyclopedia
LNER Encyclopedia