LNER clipped buffers, was there a reason??
Moderators: 52D, Tom F, Rlangham, Atlantic 3279, Blink Bonny, Saint Johnstoun, richard
-
- NBR D34 4-4-0 'Glen'
- Posts: 252
- Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2006 2:10 pm
- Location: Teesside (51K)
LNER clipped buffers, was there a reason??
After looking at the Gresley coaches at the NYMR today a couple of questions popped up;
1) Was there a purpose for the clipped buffers?
Was it just a Gresley 'thing' so he was different from the rest of the 'Big 4' or did they have a purpose?
2) Why wern't locomotives given clipped buffers?
Regards
Karl
1) Was there a purpose for the clipped buffers?
Was it just a Gresley 'thing' so he was different from the rest of the 'Big 4' or did they have a purpose?
2) Why wern't locomotives given clipped buffers?
Regards
Karl
NYMR Guard
-
- GCR D11 4-4-0 'Improved Director'
- Posts: 464
- Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2006 5:53 am
- Location: Canberra, Australia
-
- LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
- Posts: 4303
- Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 8:46 am
'Clipped' buffers have part of the edge of the buffer removed, so instead of a round shape they are flat along an edge, as below:
http://www.well-hill.demon.co.uk/lnerca ... CF0003.htm
(From the very interesting LNERCA site which is always worth a visit)
I have to say I don't know why they were used on coaches. On CCTs with end doors, they were used so that a flap door could be opened down onto them and vehicles driven/moved along a train from wagon to wagon. On coaches, I don't believe it's coincidence that they are below the level of the bodywork, but I find it very hard to see a scenario where the buffer is retracted to such an extent that it passes under the body.
IIRC earlier Gresley coach buffers were clipped top and bottom; later ones only at the top.
Non-corridor coaches had round buffers.
http://www.well-hill.demon.co.uk/lnerca ... CF0003.htm
(From the very interesting LNERCA site which is always worth a visit)
I have to say I don't know why they were used on coaches. On CCTs with end doors, they were used so that a flap door could be opened down onto them and vehicles driven/moved along a train from wagon to wagon. On coaches, I don't believe it's coincidence that they are below the level of the bodywork, but I find it very hard to see a scenario where the buffer is retracted to such an extent that it passes under the body.
IIRC earlier Gresley coach buffers were clipped top and bottom; later ones only at the top.
Non-corridor coaches had round buffers.
-
- NBR D34 4-4-0 'Glen'
- Posts: 252
- Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2006 2:10 pm
- Location: Teesside (51K)
I thought I had read that somewhere but had not seen any proof of it in action apart from on our resident Thompson CL, which I thought may have had replacement buffers as IIRC it was built in BR days and not actually LNER days.jwealleans wrote: Non-corridor coaches had round buffers.
Regards
Karl
NYMR Guard
-
- LNER Thompson B1 4-6-0 'Antelope'
- Posts: 657
- Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 4:44 pm
- Location: Derbyshire
- Contact:
David Jenkinson hints at an answer in his British Railway Carriages in the 20th Century.
Longer carriages needed larger buffers because they could be prone to buffer locking on curves when marshalled with short wheelbase stock.
Some railways adopted oval buffers. If you think about it, it is quite difficult to turn a full size oval buffer on a lathe, but it is much easier to make a large round one and clip off the top (and the bottom). Why clip them? Could it be that large buffers were unsightly and got in the way of the corridors if they extended above solebar height? They were also heavier.
These Gresley corridor carriages also had buckeye couplings which rendered buffers unnecessary and so these were retracted to allow the buckeyes to keep the carriages apart. Continuous rakes of Gresley Corridor carriages should be modelled with retracted buffers and these are available. When I fitted mine with Kadees, I also fitted retracted buffers so that I could use a Kadee with a shorter shank. The carriages at the ends of rakes should have extended buffers.
Colombo
Longer carriages needed larger buffers because they could be prone to buffer locking on curves when marshalled with short wheelbase stock.
Some railways adopted oval buffers. If you think about it, it is quite difficult to turn a full size oval buffer on a lathe, but it is much easier to make a large round one and clip off the top (and the bottom). Why clip them? Could it be that large buffers were unsightly and got in the way of the corridors if they extended above solebar height? They were also heavier.
These Gresley corridor carriages also had buckeye couplings which rendered buffers unnecessary and so these were retracted to allow the buckeyes to keep the carriages apart. Continuous rakes of Gresley Corridor carriages should be modelled with retracted buffers and these are available. When I fitted mine with Kadees, I also fitted retracted buffers so that I could use a Kadee with a shorter shank. The carriages at the ends of rakes should have extended buffers.
Colombo
-
- NBR D34 4-4-0 'Glen'
- Posts: 252
- Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2006 2:10 pm
- Location: Teesside (51K)
-
- LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
- Posts: 4303
- Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 8:46 am
- richard
- LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
- Posts: 3390
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 5:11 pm
- Location: Wichita Falls, Texas
- Contact:
These are the N Gauge ones from Chivers. "RC906 N Gauge LNER Extra Long CCT".
I was sorting out last night and found the instructions and noticed it said to file them - something I missed when I was making them. I also see on the diagram (the same one as is in Historic Carriage Drawings vol.3) that the tops are shorter.
Richard
I was sorting out last night and found the instructions and noticed it said to file them - something I missed when I was making them. I also see on the diagram (the same one as is in Historic Carriage Drawings vol.3) that the tops are shorter.
Richard
Richard Marsden
LNER Encyclopedia
LNER Encyclopedia