working on the chain gang
Moderators: 52D, Tom F, Rlangham, Atlantic 3279, Blink Bonny, Saint Johnstoun, richard
working on the chain gang
What are these "yards" things? In my day if it wasn't miles it was chains.
Footbridge at Cheshunt earlier today.
Footbridge at Cheshunt earlier today.
- StevieG
- LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
- Posts: 2353
- Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 9:08 pm
- Location: Near the GN main line in N.Herts.
Re: working on the chain gang
And I'd say it still ought to be in Chains ( - officially; however archaic that may appear: Well I'm pretty sure it would've been chains up to last year at least, anyway).Mr Bunt wrote:What are these "yards" things? In my day if it wasn't miles it was chains.
Footbridge at Cheshunt earlier today.
BZOH
/\ \ \ //\ \
/// \ \ \ \
/\ \ \ //\ \
/// \ \ \ \
Re: working on the chain gang
Don't know when this plate went up, but grateful it isn't metricStevieG wrote:And I'd say it still ought to be in Chains ( - officially; however archaic that may appear: Well I'm pretty sure it would've been chains up to last year at least, anyway).Mr Bunt wrote:What are these "yards" things? In my day if it wasn't miles it was chains.
Footbridge at Cheshunt earlier today.
- R. pike
- GNR C1 4-4-2
- Posts: 765
- Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 1:21 pm
- Location: just off the GN mainline
- Contact:
Re: working on the chain gang
This bridge was put up over Christmas and is marked in miles chains...
- StevieG
- LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
- Posts: 2353
- Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 9:08 pm
- Location: Near the GN main line in N.Herts.
Re: working on the chain gang
Presume it's the first one to be put up between 107 and 108 (i.e., suffix 'A'), but wonder what the 'D's for?R. pike wrote:This bridge was put up over Christmas and is marked in miles chains...
BZOH
/\ \ \ //\ \
/// \ \ \ \
/\ \ \ //\ \
/// \ \ \ \
- R. pike
- GNR C1 4-4-2
- Posts: 765
- Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 1:21 pm
- Location: just off the GN mainline
- Contact:
Re: working on the chain gang
There is already a 107D i believe.. I've not really worked it out yet.StevieG wrote:Presume it's the first one to be put up between 107 and 108 (i.e., suffix 'A'), but wonder what the 'D's for?R. pike wrote:This bridge was put up over Christmas and is marked in miles chains...
- 52D
- LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
- Posts: 3968
- Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 3:50 pm
- Location: Reallocated now between the Lickey and GWR
- Contact:
Re: working on the chain gang
Doncaster or Darlington area?
Hi interested in the area served by 52D. also researching colliery wagonways from same area.
- R. pike
- GNR C1 4-4-2
- Posts: 765
- Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 1:21 pm
- Location: just off the GN mainline
- Contact:
Re: working on the chain gang
Arlesey.52D wrote:Doncaster or Darlington area?
- manna
- LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
- Posts: 3863
- Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 12:56 am
- Location: All over Australia
Re: working on the chain gang
G'Day Gents
Bang goes that bit of logic
manna
Bang goes that bit of logic
manna
EDGWARE GN, Steam in the Suburbs.
- 60041
- GCR O4 2-8-0 'ROD'
- Posts: 559
- Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 8:36 pm
- Location: 20 feet from the ECML, 52D, Northumberland
Re: working on the chain gang
We live in a former railway property next to the ECML. I have had recent communications from Network Rail concerning drainage and fencing, and all their paperwork refers to miles and chains. Quite handy really as there is the 31 3/4 mile post at the end of the garden so it is easy to work out the distance along the boundary from that, if the paperwork was in Km and metres I would be totally lost.
- StevieG
- LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
- Posts: 2353
- Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 9:08 pm
- Location: Near the GN main line in N.Herts.
Re: working on the chain gang
Not necessarily.manna wrote:G'Day Gents
Bang goes that bit of logic
manna
Darlington area, and quite possibly Doncaster area if north of Shaftholme, as ex-NER territory, could easily have a different number series for ECML bridges.
The ELR (Engineer's Line References) codes for long routes are often sub-divided these days); e.g. ECM1, ECM2, etc., as seen in the photo in RP's post of yesterday (not sure how long this practice has been in place).
BZOH
/\ \ \ //\ \
/// \ \ \ \
/\ \ \ //\ \
/// \ \ \ \
Re: working on the chain gang
ECML mileages count from zero at KX to York. Then from zero at York to Newcastle, zero from Newcastle to the border and from zero at Edinburgh to the border.
Re: working on the chain gang
ELRs came into general use in the late 80s prior to that a numeric route code had been tried.
Can be easily found in Quail maps.
Most ELRs are fairly easy to work out.
Generally an initial for a junction or station at each end.
YMS - York - Malton - Scarborough.
HBS - Hull - Bridlington - Seamer
TJC3 - Tapton Jcn - Colne from Normanton through Leeds West to Skipton North.
The number is in place when the route has been subdivided as stated earlier like ECM 1,2,3,4,5,
As for how long the practice of including the code on bridge plates.
I seem to remember seeing my first one in the mid 90s on Leeds North West electrification works.
As for the use of chainages this is definately because all structure records are recorded in Miles, Chains and yards. I think Links have finally disappeared though.
Unless that is the structure is an Overhead Power mast then it is located in KMs.
Can be easily found in Quail maps.
Most ELRs are fairly easy to work out.
Generally an initial for a junction or station at each end.
YMS - York - Malton - Scarborough.
HBS - Hull - Bridlington - Seamer
TJC3 - Tapton Jcn - Colne from Normanton through Leeds West to Skipton North.
The number is in place when the route has been subdivided as stated earlier like ECM 1,2,3,4,5,
As for how long the practice of including the code on bridge plates.
I seem to remember seeing my first one in the mid 90s on Leeds North West electrification works.
As for the use of chainages this is definately because all structure records are recorded in Miles, Chains and yards. I think Links have finally disappeared though.
Unless that is the structure is an Overhead Power mast then it is located in KMs.
- StevieG
- LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
- Posts: 2353
- Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 9:08 pm
- Location: Near the GN main line in N.Herts.
Re: working on the chain gang
Agreed, 52A. But do the bridge number series start at the same zero mileposts I wonder. I don't know.52A wrote:ECML mileages count from zero at KX to York. Then from zero at York to Newcastle, zero from Newcastle to the border and from zero at Edinburgh to the border.
Oh for access to GEOGIS; - Sorry, CARRS!
There is also an alpha-numeric system in internal use called 'Line Of Route' (LOR) principally for non-engineering purposes I'd think, and is found in such as Sectional Appendix Table 'A' line diagram page headings and Weekly Operating Notice route sections; e.g. LN101 (the modern NR 'LNE' Route), and EA1310 ('East Anglia' Route).Bryan wrote: " ELRs came into general use in the late 80s prior to that a numeric route code had been tried.
Can be easily found in Quail maps. .... "
Is that anything to do with the numeric code you refer to? Or is it the method used in the 1947 LNER Sectional Appendices?
... for the ECML electrification (including the earlier GN Suburban elec'n), and presumably other relatively modern schemes, yes.Bryan wrote: " .... Unless that is the structure is an Overhead Power mast then it is located in KMs. "
But to be fair this isn't always so everywhere. For example the London - Liverpool/Manchester sections at least of the WCML elec'n, I'd have thought would be numbered imperially, and the early GE overhead structures (e.g. Liverpool Street - Southend Vic., are definitely No.'d in Miles / nnth structure in the mile.
BZOH
/\ \ \ //\ \
/// \ \ \ \
/\ \ \ //\ \
/// \ \ \ \
Re: working on the chain gang
Is the bridge the new Hitchin flyover and the D refers to one of the at least 4 spans?