East Coast Trains flood response (warning - swearing)

This forum is for the discussion of all railway subjects that do not include the LNER, and its constituent companies.

Moderators: 52D, Tom F, Rlangham, Atlantic 3279, Blink Bonny, Saint Johnstoun, richard

easternstreak
LNER Thompson L1 2-6-4T
Posts: 95
Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 3:22 pm

Re: East Coast Trains flood response (warning - swearing)

Post by easternstreak »

marksouthcoast wrote:They are fools if the think that rudness and arrogance are the way forward ,a fist is not the way to resolve proplems, politness and comman curtisey can open a lot of doors.
I just have to agree, a fist causes problems not solve them.
WOOTANG
GNSR D40 4-4-0
Posts: 227
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 3:54 pm
Location: middlesbrough
Contact:

Re: East Coast Trains flood response (warning - swearing)

Post by WOOTANG »

thats all over facebook
but i love it
JRS - Jordans Railway Simulator
User avatar
manna
LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
Posts: 3863
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 12:56 am
Location: All over Australia

Re: East Coast Trains flood response (warning - swearing)

Post by manna »

G'Day Gents

I don't think your the last bastion of decencies, I suspect that more than 90% of people are like you and me, it is always the 10% that make us all look bad.

Isn't spitting at a policeman, an offense, I find that a truncheon across the bridge of the nose, calms people down rapidly :twisted:

manna
EDGWARE GN, Steam in the Suburbs.
marksouthcoast
LNER J39 0-6-0
Posts: 155
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2012 7:48 pm

Re: East Coast Trains flood response (warning - swearing)

Post by marksouthcoast »

So true.
giner
LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
Posts: 1558
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 5:17 am
Location: Alberta - ex. Stevenage

Re: East Coast Trains flood response (warning - swearing)

Post by giner »

One of my wife's Rotherham truisms is: You catch more flies with honey than vinegar. A good 'un, that.
User avatar
StevieG
LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
Posts: 2353
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 9:08 pm
Location: Near the GN main line in N.Herts.

Re: East Coast Trains flood response (warning - swearing)

Post by StevieG »

At least, AFAIK, there's been no response/explanation for the degree of disruption, which cites 'The wrong type of water'. :roll: :cry:
:lol:
BZOH

/
\ \ \ //\ \
/// \ \ \ \
marksouthcoast
LNER J39 0-6-0
Posts: 155
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2012 7:48 pm

Re: East Coast Trains flood response (warning - swearing)

Post by marksouthcoast »

Telling people the truth and asking for understanding seems to beyound a lot of managers grasp coupled with a lack of common sense.
User avatar
richard
LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
Posts: 3390
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 5:11 pm
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas
Contact:

Re: East Coast Trains flood response (warning - swearing)

Post by richard »

People say that, but managers know differently. "Wrong type of snow" was an honest explanation, but it didn't go down too well, did it?
Richard Marsden
LNER Encyclopedia
User avatar
StevieG
LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
Posts: 2353
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 9:08 pm
Location: Near the GN main line in N.Herts.

Re: East Coast Trains flood response (warning - swearing)

Post by StevieG »

We seem now to be in a different world from the one in which Gerald Fiennes was moved to demand that the King's Cross announcer inform the alighting passengers that the late arrival of an Up Pullman had been caused by incompetent management.
BZOH

/
\ \ \ //\ \
/// \ \ \ \
Mickey

Re: East Coast Trains flood response (warning - swearing)

Post by Mickey »

Deleted
Last edited by Mickey on Tue Apr 29, 2014 11:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Blink Bonny
LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
Posts: 3946
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 9:21 pm
Location: The Midlands
Contact:

Re: East Coast Trains flood response (warning - swearing)

Post by Blink Bonny »

richard wrote:People say that, but managers know differently. "Wrong type of snow" was an honest explanation, but it didn't go down too well, did it?
Ay up!

The problem wasn't the snow, but rather managers with no common sense. The newer EMU transformers need to be in a "clean" environment so need a supply of filtered air. Rather then order expensive, wasteful (but waterproof) fibreglass ones, they instead ordered cheaper but definitely non-waterproof paper ones. Result? The wind blew snow onto the filters. If the transformer was still warm, then this melted the snow and the saturated filter ran down the inside of the transformer case, leaving the tranny open to the elements to its distinct detriment. Wrong type of snow? Wrong type of filter ordered by the wrong type of manager. And some poor sod who wasn't briefed properly and had no idea as to what was going on.

Both Mrs BB and I have been in this situation. In fact, before doing a presentation for Yorkshire Water I started looking at the Works In Progress database (i draw a discreet veil over how I obtained access to this!) before doing anything. We both found ourselves in front of hostile crowds trying to explain stuff we should have been briefed about but weren't.
If I ain't here, I'm in Bilston, scoffing decent chips at last!!!!
User avatar
richard
LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
Posts: 3390
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 5:11 pm
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas
Contact:

Re: East Coast Trains flood response (warning - swearing)

Post by richard »

I was thinking of point motors & blades rather than EMUs. Of course there was a time when a steam lance would have done the trick in no time...
Richard Marsden
LNER Encyclopedia
User avatar
StevieG
LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
Posts: 2353
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 9:08 pm
Location: Near the GN main line in N.Herts.

Re: East Coast Trains flood response (warning - swearing)

Post by StevieG »

I certainly remember the 'snow ingress to transformers' facet of the problems. It was poor Terry Worrall who had to give the explanation and was for so long afterwards 'the wrong kind of snow man'; and I think it was Class 317 EMUs on the BedPan line that were (amongst?) the ones that were 'falling (failing) over like flies', rather than the type of snow getting into points switches (blades) causing the unusually bad and headlining problems.

However, that snow in the points did cause a degree of difficulty : We had to resort to slowing ECML 'non-stop's going through Hitchin* by late signal-clearing, in an effort to keep the Down route across to Royston going [I think it was before 'the wires' went beyond Royston, to Cambridge and further], else freshly cleared points would get problematic by the slipstream of un-signal-checked fast trains drawing clouds of the snow back into the points almost immediately.
... *-(and other key locations? I can't remember.)
BZOH

/
\ \ \ //\ \
/// \ \ \ \
Mickey

Re: East Coast Trains flood response (warning - swearing)

Post by Mickey »

Deleted
Last edited by Mickey on Tue Apr 29, 2014 11:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
52A
LNER V2 2-6-2 'Green Arrow'
Posts: 1107
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 10:50 am

Re: East Coast Trains flood response (warning - swearing)

Post by 52A »

So, Notwork Fail have all these people with fancy titles, why can't they run trains when there are simple signal failures and run buses instead? (Signallers stand on ships and wave flags at each other).
Post Reply