60502 Earl Marischal's tender

This forum is for the discussion of the locomotives, motive power, and rolling stock of the LNER and its constituent companies.

Moderators: 52D, Tom F, Rlangham, Atlantic 3279, Blink Bonny, Saint Johnstoun, richard

User avatar
Tom F
LNER A3 4-6-2
Posts: 1270
Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 6:23 pm
Location: North of the Don.....South of the Tees
Contact:

60502 Earl Marischal's tender

Post by Tom F »

Hi all

I've been looking into this particular York pacific. Would I be right in thinking her tender was pretty much an A3 Non corridor tender beaded, with no streamline front to it unlike her later sisters.

Have found a picture of her in apple green and this appears to be the case, but I'm more interested in the early 50s.

Cheers

Tom
Tom Foster
Modelling the North Eastern Area of the LNER - 1935-1939
User avatar
Blink Bonny
LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
Posts: 3946
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 9:21 pm
Location: The Midlands
Contact:

Re: 60502 Earl Marischal's tender

Post by Blink Bonny »

Ay up!

Still the same in BR days. Follow this link for more details:

http://www.gotopcs.net/60502.htm
If I ain't here, I'm in Bilston, scoffing decent chips at last!!!!
User avatar
Tom F
LNER A3 4-6-2
Posts: 1270
Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 6:23 pm
Location: North of the Don.....South of the Tees
Contact:

Re: 60502 Earl Marischal's tender

Post by Tom F »

Blink Bonny wrote:Ay up!

Still the same in BR days. Follow this link for more details:

http://www.gotopcs.net/60502.htm
Sort of answers my question, so thats clear then.....she had a A3 tender pretty much...no streamlining.

Was 60501 the same?
Tom Foster
Modelling the North Eastern Area of the LNER - 1935-1939
User avatar
Blink Bonny
LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
Posts: 3946
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 9:21 pm
Location: The Midlands
Contact:

Re: 60502 Earl Marischal's tender

Post by Blink Bonny »

Ay up!

It was indeed. Have a shufty: http://www.flickr.com/photos/38949371@N04/3665204886/
If I ain't here, I'm in Bilston, scoffing decent chips at last!!!!
User avatar
60800
LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
Posts: 2316
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 5:41 pm
Location: N-Lincolnshire
Contact:

Re: 60502 Earl Marischal's tender

Post by 60800 »

Blink Bonny wrote:Ay up!

It was indeed. Have a shufty: http://www.flickr.com/photos/38949371@N04/3665204886/
That's a sorry sight :cry: tis just a shame Thompson's excuse to rebuild the P2's was easily backed up...
36C - Based out of 50H and 36F
User avatar
Tom F
LNER A3 4-6-2
Posts: 1270
Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 6:23 pm
Location: North of the Don.....South of the Tees
Contact:

Re: 60502 Earl Marischal's tender

Post by Tom F »

blackout60800 wrote:
Blink Bonny wrote:Ay up!

It was indeed. Have a shufty: http://www.flickr.com/photos/38949371@N04/3665204886/
That's a sorry sight :cry: tis just a shame Thompson's excuse to rebuild the P2's was easily backed up...
All depends on opinions really...I don't mind the Thompson pacifics, quite partial to them. they may be un gainly, even ugly...but that sheer length and size must have been mightly impressive if one was watching one move around the yard at York!
Tom Foster
Modelling the North Eastern Area of the LNER - 1935-1939
User avatar
coachmann
GCR D11 4-4-0 'Improved Director'
Posts: 487
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 8:52 pm

Re: 60502 Earl Marischal's tender

Post by coachmann »

Having already painted a lot of Gresley non-streamlined Pacifics, I remember how much more impressive the pre-production models of Thompson Pacifics looked when they arrived here from Bill Stott (NuCast) for painting. The 'wow' factor (which they undoubtedly have) and the fact that they were part and parcel of the East Coast mainline is surely what we modellers should be thinking about, not the politics or mechanical unworthiness of the real engines.

Producing limited coach runs is my business albeit in a small way but in the advent of a small lottery win, I would commision a run of A2-2 'Cock 'O the North's and watch the rush to buy.... :P
User avatar
Tom F
LNER A3 4-6-2
Posts: 1270
Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 6:23 pm
Location: North of the Don.....South of the Tees
Contact:

Re: 60502 Earl Marischal's tender

Post by Tom F »

coachmann wrote:Having already painted a lot of Gresley non-streamlined Pacifics, I remember how much more impressive the pre-production models of Thompson Pacifics looked when they arrived here from Bill Stott (NuCast) for painting. The 'wow' factor (which they undoubtedly have) and the fact that they were part and parcel of the East Coast mainline is surely what we modellers should be thinking about, not the politics or mechanical unworthiness of the real engines.

Producing limited coach runs is my business albeit in a small way but in the advent of a small lottery win, I would commision a run of A2-2 'Cock 'O the North's and watch the rush to buy.... :P
Totally agree Coach

If your modelling the ECML you have to have Thompson pacifics...granted you could avoid the A2/1s there only being the 1 on the Eastern Region, but with all 6 A2/2s being in England, and especially there being 15 A2/3s!

As I say, I would give my right hand to have been born 50 years earlier and to have seen Lord President and Earl Marischal grandly strutting about 50A :D
Tom Foster
Modelling the North Eastern Area of the LNER - 1935-1939
User avatar
Blink Bonny
LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
Posts: 3946
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 9:21 pm
Location: The Midlands
Contact:

Re: 60502 Earl Marischal's tender

Post by Blink Bonny »

Ay up!

Impressive in the yard? Dunno. But lets face it ANY engine's impressive thrashing past at speed! :P

I've said it before and I'll say it again. It is strange how the rearward-set cylinders make the drivers look smaller. :shock:
If I ain't here, I'm in Bilston, scoffing decent chips at last!!!!
User avatar
60800
LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
Posts: 2316
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 5:41 pm
Location: N-Lincolnshire
Contact:

Re: 60502 Earl Marischal's tender

Post by 60800 »

Talking of ugly engines, there's one in particular that everyone seems to love; the Sr Q1 :)
36C - Based out of 50H and 36F
Steve05
NBR D34 4-4-0 'Glen'
Posts: 255
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2011 12:44 pm
Location: QLD Australia

Re: 60502 Earl Marischal's tender

Post by Steve05 »

Hi All,

It certainly is a matter of opinion but in the ugly stakes the rebuild is one of them.

For me its a bit like driving a Ferrari Daytona into the Doncaster workshop and coming out on ten days later with a Trabant. My reaction being, "your not bleeding serious gov"



Regards

Steve
mick b
LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
Posts: 3778
Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 4:43 pm

Re: 60502 Earl Marischal's tender

Post by mick b »

Earl Mariscal and Cock O The North had a Non Corridor tender with beaded sides and curved corners to the front of the sides.
User avatar
Blink Bonny
LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
Posts: 3946
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 9:21 pm
Location: The Midlands
Contact:

Re: 60502 Earl Marischal's tender

Post by Blink Bonny »

Ay up!

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, remember. The Q1s may be dog ugly but they were built to do a job and had no extras at all.

"'Ere, dontcha know there's a war on?
If I ain't here, I'm in Bilston, scoffing decent chips at last!!!!
S.A.C. Martin

Re: 60502 Earl Marischal's tender

Post by S.A.C. Martin »

Just to follow up regarding the possibility of an A3 tender with an A2/2 - is this tender suitable for one of the A2/2s in the 1950s?

It's a spare Hornby A3 tender I picked up somewhere, I forget where:

Image

Interesting possibility if it is, I could in theory buy an A2 to convert to A2/2, modify and use the Hornby tender, and be left with a spare A2 tender for another project...!
jukebox
LNER Thompson L1 2-6-4T
Posts: 80
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2008 9:13 am
Location: Perth, Western Australia

Re: 60502 Earl Marischal's tender

Post by jukebox »

coachmann wrote: *SNIP*
Producing limited coach runs is my business albeit in a small way but in the advent of a small lottery win, I would commision a run of A2-2 'Cock 'O the North's and watch the rush to buy.... :P
Even though you'd sell more if they were Mikado's painted in Doncaster Green? :wink:
If a Thompson rebuild is the answer... the question must have been daft to begin with!
Post Reply