Subterranean Subterfuge - Round the 2nd
Moderators: 52D, Tom F, Rlangham, Atlantic 3279, Blink Bonny, Saint Johnstoun, richard
-
- LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
- Posts: 1558
- Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 5:17 am
- Location: Alberta - ex. Stevenage
Re: Subterranean Subterfuge - Round the 2nd
And wasn't it Hylda Baker who was known for using the phrase, "Ee, common as muck!"? Speaking of commons, one that springs to mind would be close to EALING BROADWAY.
- strang steel
- LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
- Posts: 2363
- Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 3:54 pm
- Location: From 40F to near 82A via 88C
Re: Subterranean Subterfuge - Round the 2nd
"She knows, you know"
Although I thought my mention of Mr Coward would alert you to the fact that I was invoking the Wilde Gambit (although there has never been any real proof that Oscar actually used the move to his advantage).
My play of Clapham Common should have been trumped by your response of Queensway, but I fear that the riposte of Ealing Broadway is an even more deviously clever manoeuvre than I first calculated.
I think that because the entire playing group on this forum will be overcome by jealousy at your vastly superior play, I have only one choice but to go for.....
Turnham Green
Although I thought my mention of Mr Coward would alert you to the fact that I was invoking the Wilde Gambit (although there has never been any real proof that Oscar actually used the move to his advantage).
My play of Clapham Common should have been trumped by your response of Queensway, but I fear that the riposte of Ealing Broadway is an even more deviously clever manoeuvre than I first calculated.
I think that because the entire playing group on this forum will be overcome by jealousy at your vastly superior play, I have only one choice but to go for.....
Turnham Green
John.
My spotting log website is at https://spottinglogs.co.uk/spotting-rec ... s-70s-80s/
And my spotters' b&w photo site is at http://spottinglogs.blog
My spotting log website is at https://spottinglogs.co.uk/spotting-rec ... s-70s-80s/
And my spotters' b&w photo site is at http://spottinglogs.blog
-
- LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
- Posts: 1558
- Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 5:17 am
- Location: Alberta - ex. Stevenage
Re: Subterranean Subterfuge - Round the 2nd
Look here, SS. Now I'm worried. A scant seven posts ago Turnham Green was proposed. Is this a conspiracy of some sort by a covert 'green' group? If so, my Totteridge & Whetstone should have placated the tree huggers. If, however, my proposal of Ealing Broadway was such a dastardly ploy, I'd be glad to know what that ploy would be.
That said, the W5 (that's similar to the G8 but far more Top Secret) summit held deep under Swiss Cottage (not the Finchley Road one, but several hundred feet below Zurich) passed a motion that I stay with 'Broadway', so . . . FULHAM BROADWAY.
That said, the W5 (that's similar to the G8 but far more Top Secret) summit held deep under Swiss Cottage (not the Finchley Road one, but several hundred feet below Zurich) passed a motion that I stay with 'Broadway', so . . . FULHAM BROADWAY.
- strang steel
- LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
- Posts: 2363
- Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 3:54 pm
- Location: From 40F to near 82A via 88C
Re: Subterranean Subterfuge - Round the 2nd
Yes, sorry about that.
I was brought up playing the game with Count Wolfgang Von Heinrich of Prussia and his five wives, who could play a devilishly good game. They used the Cranthorpe rules (1908 revision) and one major feature they insisted on was never take any notice of previous plays (other than the one you are responding to, of course) until after your turn.
This led to much repetition and great amusement, as if the same play came up more than once in the previous ten, the perpetrator was given the awesome task of choosing the vintage of the next bottle of champagne to be opened.
It was such a hoot, I'm sure you will appreciate, and woe betide anyone who picked a notably unpalatable year (such as 1925).
For this reason only I must respond with
Ruislip Gardens
I was brought up playing the game with Count Wolfgang Von Heinrich of Prussia and his five wives, who could play a devilishly good game. They used the Cranthorpe rules (1908 revision) and one major feature they insisted on was never take any notice of previous plays (other than the one you are responding to, of course) until after your turn.
This led to much repetition and great amusement, as if the same play came up more than once in the previous ten, the perpetrator was given the awesome task of choosing the vintage of the next bottle of champagne to be opened.
It was such a hoot, I'm sure you will appreciate, and woe betide anyone who picked a notably unpalatable year (such as 1925).
For this reason only I must respond with
Ruislip Gardens
John.
My spotting log website is at https://spottinglogs.co.uk/spotting-rec ... s-70s-80s/
And my spotters' b&w photo site is at http://spottinglogs.blog
My spotting log website is at https://spottinglogs.co.uk/spotting-rec ... s-70s-80s/
And my spotters' b&w photo site is at http://spottinglogs.blog
Re: Subterranean Subterfuge - Round the 2nd
As UK Uncut might put it "It's not so much a conspiracy as a network of people who self-organize - we're empowering the people to go out there and be creative". So since the devil is now in play, I have to exorcize him/her/it with Parsons Green.
Peter
Peter
- Autocar Publicity
- NER C7 4-4-2
- Posts: 847
- Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 1:36 pm
- Location: Yorkshire
Re: Subterranean Subterfuge - Round the 2nd
I think the devil might be reluctant to leave - I refer you to Westminster
- 52D
- LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
- Posts: 3968
- Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 3:50 pm
- Location: Reallocated now between the Lickey and GWR
- Contact:
Re: Subterranean Subterfuge - Round the 2nd
one retort to the last play UPMINSTER.
Hi interested in the area served by 52D. also researching colliery wagonways from same area.
Re: Subterranean Subterfuge - Round the 2nd
Upminster, Upminster. Well Sir I am undone. to be honest I think you must be Barking Thank you and good day.
don't forget about the Great Eastern Railway
- strang steel
- LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
- Posts: 2363
- Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 3:54 pm
- Location: From 40F to near 82A via 88C
Re: Subterranean Subterfuge - Round the 2nd
I always find Barking such a difficult one to follow, but for a number of years as a memorial to my old faithful 'Jack', I have adopted the habit of responding with
Russell Square
Russell Square
John.
My spotting log website is at https://spottinglogs.co.uk/spotting-rec ... s-70s-80s/
And my spotters' b&w photo site is at http://spottinglogs.blog
My spotting log website is at https://spottinglogs.co.uk/spotting-rec ... s-70s-80s/
And my spotters' b&w photo site is at http://spottinglogs.blog
- 52D
- LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
- Posts: 3968
- Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 3:50 pm
- Location: Reallocated now between the Lickey and GWR
- Contact:
Re: Subterranean Subterfuge - Round the 2nd
I wonder if Lord Russell ever visited the North Western frontier AMERSHAM.
Hi interested in the area served by 52D. also researching colliery wagonways from same area.
-
- GCR O4 2-8-0 'ROD'
- Posts: 567
- Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 10:47 pm
- Location: Earsdon Grange sub station
Re: Subterranean Subterfuge - Round the 2nd
no i think he came to a sticky end WATERLOO
- Autocar Publicity
- NER C7 4-4-2
- Posts: 847
- Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 1:36 pm
- Location: Yorkshire
Re: Subterranean Subterfuge - Round the 2nd
When it comes to sticky ends, sitting on your toast and marmalade is a favourite (?) which of course reminds us all of LC Stanton's bare necessities and the time he sat on his humdrummits... Whilst I soak in the bath, consider Paddington.
-
- LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
- Posts: 1558
- Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 5:17 am
- Location: Alberta - ex. Stevenage
Re: Subterranean Subterfuge - Round the 2nd
Do be careful about soaking in the bath, AP. If the temperature of the water's not warm enough it could lead to shrinkage at HACKNEY WICK.
- strang steel
- LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
- Posts: 2363
- Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 3:54 pm
- Location: From 40F to near 82A via 88C
Re: Subterranean Subterfuge - Round the 2nd
Ah, but is Hackney Wick allowed?
Or are we beginning to wriggle out of the rules laid down in the 1974 Yearbook, which seems to have been recognised as the modern authority on the subject?
After all, where might this trend lead? Penzance? Thurso? Holyhead? Slough?
Oh good gracious, I think I am coming over all faint - NURSE! TRIPLE MY MEDICATION - AT ONCE, IF YOU PLEASE
but before I go, I must warn everyone that by not adhering to the Palm Court rules the game will descend into anarchy. There are pitfalls and traps everywhere, and I must therefore point you to
Snaresbrook
Or are we beginning to wriggle out of the rules laid down in the 1974 Yearbook, which seems to have been recognised as the modern authority on the subject?
After all, where might this trend lead? Penzance? Thurso? Holyhead? Slough?
Oh good gracious, I think I am coming over all faint - NURSE! TRIPLE MY MEDICATION - AT ONCE, IF YOU PLEASE
but before I go, I must warn everyone that by not adhering to the Palm Court rules the game will descend into anarchy. There are pitfalls and traps everywhere, and I must therefore point you to
Snaresbrook
John.
My spotting log website is at https://spottinglogs.co.uk/spotting-rec ... s-70s-80s/
And my spotters' b&w photo site is at http://spottinglogs.blog
My spotting log website is at https://spottinglogs.co.uk/spotting-rec ... s-70s-80s/
And my spotters' b&w photo site is at http://spottinglogs.blog
-
- LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
- Posts: 1558
- Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 5:17 am
- Location: Alberta - ex. Stevenage
Re: Subterranean Subterfuge - Round the 2nd
Sorry about Hackney Wick, SS. Just had to pop up for a breath of fresh air. So Snaresbrook. Still out in the open, then.
Not being one to flout the rules, even as antiquarian as 1974 - although suitably amended in 1975 after a heavy night in the Rose and Crown, I suppose we'd better get deep under the surface again, HOLBORN. Deep enough?
Not being one to flout the rules, even as antiquarian as 1974 - although suitably amended in 1975 after a heavy night in the Rose and Crown, I suppose we'd better get deep under the surface again, HOLBORN. Deep enough?