Britannia's on the ECML

This forum is for the discussion of the LNER, its constituent companies, and their histories.

Moderators: 52D, Tom F, Rlangham, Atlantic 3279, Blink Bonny, Saint Johnstoun, richard

Mickey

Re: Britannia's on the ECML

Post by Mickey »

Deleted
Last edited by Mickey on Sat May 03, 2014 6:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
50C
GNSR D40 4-4-0
Posts: 241
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 10:51 pm
Location: Farnham-Surrey(ex Selby-Yorks)

Re: Britannia's on the ECML

Post by 50C »

When March first received its Britannias they started to appear on the Colchester-Newcastle as far as York on summer Saturdays.During the week it was a V2 or on occassion a Sandringham before they were withdrawn.The down train stopped at Selby at 1.03pm and returned at 3.15pm.On one Saturday the up train had two Brits on it.
Is this possibly the one and only time double headed Brits traversed the ECML on a passenger working albeit only between York and Doncaster ?

50c
User avatar
strang steel
LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
Posts: 2363
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 3:54 pm
Location: From 40F to near 82A via 88C

Re: Britannia's on the ECML

Post by strang steel »

There are some good video shots of Brits on the East Lincs line in the Marsden Rail video no32 Kings Cross to York.

(usual disclaimer).
John.

My spotting log website is at https://spottinglogs.co.uk/spotting-rec ... s-70s-80s/

And my spotters' b&w photo site is at http://spottinglogs.blog
User avatar
StevieG
LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
Posts: 2353
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 9:08 pm
Location: Near the GN main line in N.Herts.

Re: Britannia's on the ECML

Post by StevieG »

An old-ish Liverpool Street hand (a signalman), once told me that one reason GE men reckoned that Britannias were superior compared with what they had had previously, was that with their smoke deflectors, their front ends collected a greater number of pheasants etc., en route !
BZOH

/
\ \ \ //\ \
/// \ \ \ \
third-rail
GCR O4 2-8-0 'ROD'
Posts: 567
Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 10:47 pm
Location: Earsdon Grange sub station

Re: Britannia's on the ECML

Post by third-rail »

StevieG wrote:An old-ish Liverpool Street hand (a signalman), once told me that one reason GE men reckoned that Britannias were superior compared with what they had had previously, was that with their smoke deflectors, their front ends collected a greater number of pheasants etc., en route !
nicely cooked en route :D
ajax103
LNER N2 0-6-2T
Posts: 50
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 7:08 pm

Re: Britannia's on the ECML

Post by ajax103 »

Locoman69 wrote:
These trains departed Kings Cross on the return journey at 4.05p and 6.18pm. The newly introduced ‘Master Cutler’ Kings Cross – Sheffield Pullman departed Kings Cross at 4.20pm and was timed to pass the ‘Cleethorpes’ whilst stationary at Huntingdon.
[/size]
What route did the ‘Master Cutler’ take then on the Kings Cross to Sheffield Pullman and what stops were there?
User avatar
strang steel
LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
Posts: 2363
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 3:54 pm
Location: From 40F to near 82A via 88C

Re: Britannia's on the ECML

Post by strang steel »

ajax103 wrote:
Locoman69 wrote:
These trains departed Kings Cross on the return journey at 4.05p and 6.18pm. The newly introduced ‘Master Cutler’ Kings Cross – Sheffield Pullman departed Kings Cross at 4.20pm and was timed to pass the ‘Cleethorpes’ whilst stationary at Huntingdon.
[/size]
What route did the ‘Master Cutler’ take then on the Kings Cross to Sheffield Pullman and what stops were there?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Master_Cutler_%28train%29
John.

My spotting log website is at https://spottinglogs.co.uk/spotting-rec ... s-70s-80s/

And my spotters' b&w photo site is at http://spottinglogs.blog
chaz harrison
GCR O4 2-8-0 'ROD'
Posts: 599
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 10:35 am

Re: Britannia's on the ECML

Post by chaz harrison »

I seem to remember reading that the reason the Immingham Brits were allocated as a numerical block was to prevent the time-honoured practice of sending the most run down lame ducks when transferring.
Obviously this can't apply to the allocation of new locos but I wonder if this habit gave rise to at least some of the hostility of loco crews to unfamiliar machines?

Chaz
Post Reply