Why are the Monopoly Stations all LNER?

This forum is for the discussion of the LNER, its constituent companies, and their histories.

Moderators: 52D, Tom F, Rlangham, Atlantic 3279, Blink Bonny, Saint Johnstoun, richard

Post Reply
Matthew W
NER Y7 0-4-0T
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 4:33 pm

Why are the Monopoly Stations all LNER?

Post by Matthew W »

Hello,

I'm a student, writing a dissertation about the board game Monopoly, and I'm stuck.

I'm trying to find out why the British/London board has four stations from the one company, (not one station each, from the four London-serving companies). Reference books, etc, only speculate on the L.N.E.R. making a deal with Waddingtons.

The four (L.N.E.R.) stations featured are; Kings Cross, Marylebone, Liverpool Street, and Fenchurch Street.

Does anyone know of a possible source of information?

Thanking you in advance for your help,

Matthew.
Muzza
LNER N2 0-6-2T
Posts: 57
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2006 2:22 am
Location: Mareeba, Australia

Re: Why are the Monopoly Stations all LNER?

Post by Muzza »

Matthew W wrote:Hello,

I'm a student, writing a dissertation about the board game Monopoly, and I'm stuck.

I'm trying to find out why the British/London board has four stations from the one company, (not one station each, from the four London-serving companies). Reference books, etc, only speculate on the L.N.E.R. making a deal with Waddingtons.

The four (L.N.E.R.) stations featured are; Kings Cross, Marylebone, Liverpool Street, and Fenchurch Street.

Does anyone know of a possible source of information?

Thanking you in advance for your help,

Matthew.
Hi Matthew,

I had heard the story that the person deciding the place names for the game asked his secretary for the names of 4 London termini. As the lady in question was related to an employee of the LNER, she came up with 4 LNER stations. Sorry that I can't vouch for the accuracy of that story.

I guess it would also be hard to hold a monopoly of stations in the game if they were owned by 4 different companies.

Cheers,


Murray
User avatar
Flamingo
GCR O4 2-8-0 'ROD'
Posts: 565
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 1:23 pm
Location: Hampshire

Re: Why are the Monopoly Stations all LNER?

Post by Flamingo »

The previous reply is part of the story. I think the rest is that Waddingtons Ltd. who were licenced to produce the UK version of the Monopoly game were based in Leeds. When the company's director and secretary came up to London to discuss the matter they arrived at an LNER station (Kings Cross) and that was how the choice was made.
Matthew W
NER Y7 0-4-0T
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 4:33 pm

Re: Why are the Monopoly Stations all LNER?

Post by Matthew W »

Thanks for the replies so far,

If you can think of any more information, (or a citable source for that already given), please post it.

Thanks,

Matthew.
North Briton
GER J70 0-6-0T Tram
Posts: 10
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 7:13 pm
Location: West Yorkshire

Re: Why are the Monopoly Stations all LNER?

Post by North Briton »

Matthew

Victor Watson has just published a partial history of Waddingtons "The Waddingtons Story" www.jeremymillspublishing.co.uk ISBN 978-1-906600-36-5. If you have not got a copy I think you will find it a very useful source.

He refers to a 1973 History of Waddingtons by Douglas Brearley (a Waddingtons employee) and Phil Orbanes - " Monopoly: The World's Most Famous Game and How it Got That Way". Mr Watson states that the involvement of Waddingtons is as chronicled in these two books. In brief, Victor Watson Senior, (the grandfather of the present Victor Watson), acquired the rights to Monopoly from Parker Bros. He and his secretary went to London and took a taxi ride from where they allocated names of streets. No specific mention of the actual sites apart from the Angel Islington which is where they ended up having tea in a Lyons tea shop

As a Leeds based company they will have used the LNER service to London so perhaps they were more familiar with that company. It is highly probable that they would have had commercial and/or social contact with members of the LNER board so that might have also been a factor

I might be able to get a more specific answer from Mr Watson but it might be after the New Year.

Good luck with the dissertation.
byegad
NER Y7 0-4-0T
Posts: 9
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 9:34 pm

Re: Why are the Monopoly Stations all LNER?

Post by byegad »

OR....................


Were there any other Railway companies at the time?????





Stands back for deluge of Late Moldy and Slow, Great Way Round and Sometimes Runs flak.
Bill Bedford
LNER A3 4-6-2
Posts: 1241
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 9:43 pm

Re: Why are the Monopoly Stations all LNER?

Post by Bill Bedford »

North Briton wrote:As a Leeds based company they will have used the LNER service to London
Why? they could have used the Midland.
hq1hitchin
LNER V2 2-6-2 'Green Arrow'
Posts: 1162
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 8:32 pm
Location: Newbury, Berks

Re: Why are the Monopoly Stations all LNER?

Post by hq1hitchin »

Bill Bedford wrote:
North Briton wrote:As a Leeds based company they will have used the LNER service to London
Why? they could have used the Midland.

Yes, but surely the main passenger flow was into Kings X by the 1930s - so what's that got do do with the price of fish? lol
A topper is proper if the train's a non-stopper!
Bill Bedford
LNER A3 4-6-2
Posts: 1241
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 9:43 pm

Re: Why are the Monopoly Stations all LNER?

Post by Bill Bedford »

hq1hitchin wrote:
Bill Bedford wrote:Yes, but surely the main passenger flow was into Kings X by the 1930s
Was it? I haven't heard that the LMS stopped running Leeds and Bradford expresses, or that the stopped the Scots expresses over the Settle and Carlisle.
hq1hitchin
LNER V2 2-6-2 'Green Arrow'
Posts: 1162
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 8:32 pm
Location: Newbury, Berks

Re: Why are the Monopoly Stations all LNER?

Post by hq1hitchin »

Bill Bedford wrote:
hq1hitchin wrote:
Bill Bedford wrote:Yes, but surely the main passenger flow was into Kings X by the 1930s
Was it? I haven't heard that the LMS stopped running Leeds and Bradford expresses, or that the stopped the Scots expresses over the Settle and Carlisle.

Slightly more trains into KX per day - and Pullman services to boot for the benefit of company directors and other toffs :) ?
A topper is proper if the train's a non-stopper!
Post Reply