Passenger rail services in the north island of New Zealand
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2006 11:00 am
I have recently written an article down here in New Zealand about the closure of the only mainline passenger railway service between Auckland and Wellington, it runs the length of the north island.
I have reproduced the whole text here as I believe this needs some airing
and hope that some of the good folks of the forum will understand my need to share this .
The New Zealand Herald (the main paper in NZ) have said they will print my article as it's topical, but I'll believe that when I see it.
Copies have also been sent to the Prime Minister and her deputy as well as the Minister responsible for railways so I now await their wrath .
If anyone is interested in the topic I shall report back from time to time.
The Overlander
“Labour is committed to developing a sustainable transport system that is safe, affordable, responsive to the needs of users, and which contributes to New Zealand’s economic development, as well as social and environmental goals. Achieving those goals depends on having a strong, integrated transport sector and good infrastructure.”
The opening vision statement of Labour’s 2005 transport policy seems attractive but it’s been conveniently forgotten in the case of the imminent closure of the Overlander passenger train service.
Where other forward thinking countries are pouring billions of dollars into updating their railway systems, New Zealand meanwhile chooses to close its only north island mainline passenger train. For example, China has recently completed a massive new railway project into Tibet at a cost of nearly seven billion dollars. Richard Branson in the UK is proposing to provide 320kph trains on the mainline between London and Edinburgh at an estimated cost of fifteen billion dollars. Countries as disparate as Brazil, Saudi Arabia and Malaysia are investing heavily in railway services.
Why has this happened? In New Zealand’s case the answer is simplistically short – political will, or more accurately, lack of political will.
The problem is deeply rooted in the evils of rail privatisation and the god of shareholder profits.
Take a look at all other forms of transport in New Zealand and you will see continuous governmental and non-governmental organisations improving and investing in transport, designed to offer the fastest, smoothest and latest way to transport people and goods throughout the country. The state supported airline carrier “Air New Zealand” is constantly updating their aircraft and improving them with new passenger comforts, more airlines are offering better and more frequent low cost services. Investment in shipping is increasing, look at the new Inter-Island ferry “Kaitaki” with it’s larger capacity, higher speeds and greater comfort.
Roads too are constantly being upgraded and improved, new motorways are being built, there are increased numbers of new cars, buses and lorries using the New Zealand road network. Billions of dollars from government coffers are being invested in New Zealand roads; these roads are then freely used by coach companies and freight lorries in direct competition to rail services. The same level of funding should be ploughed into railways to support the rail network and so create a level playing field. The UK is investing heavily in small lines through government investment, providing seed funding, creating partnerships between local government and community groups. The disused York to Hull railway line for example with no current track or infrastructure, is being invested in with eight hundred and seventy four million dollars set aside for rebuilding the line and providing stock. There is even a new mainline A1 Pacific express steam locomotive being built with private funding in the UK. New Zealand’s railways meanwhile have become the Cinderella of the transport sector still using carriages at least thirty years old; there is no apparent pride in the service, not even a lick of paint on the locomotives or other carriage stock.
What are the direct and immediate economic effects of the closure of the “Overlander” service?
Service businesses dotted throughout the length of the line and at the terminii will suffer substantially. Directly affected are small to medium enterprises such as the café at National Park set to lose 50% of its staff. Toll itself will have to re-deploy the thirty-five staff currently employed on the Overlander. The tourism infrastructure will be depleted in every small community throughout the length of the rail corridor. There will also be fewer travel options for tourist visitors. Couple this with the loss of a truly great train journey and the knock-on or hidden economic losses are not difficult to predict.
What price our identity and nationhood? What price our cultural heritage? The Overlander is first and foremost an iconic service, as much a part of the Kiwi identity as rugby or the beach in summer. This blow strikes at the very heart of our national psyche leaving us all breathless, unable to believe that something so Kiwi can be so lightly and easily lost forever, then to suffer the indignity of the facts being glossed over by Toll and the government with their “business speak”. The fascinating history of the railways in Taumarunui “On the Main Trunk Line” and the subsequent opening up of the Central North Island to loggers and other settlers, even to New Zealand itself, is invested in this line and it’s passenger service. There was no consultation with the public, no warning given, no information from government until we were presented with a fait accompli. Shame! We are the victims of grey men in grey suits with nothing else to offer other than grey ideas? Where are the politicians with vision, courage and marketing knowledge? Are we as a country only interested in short term solutions, the now rather than what could be, the “once and future” railways, the lack of political national pride is an unconscionable dereliction of duty to the electorate.
Trains are green and fuel-efficient. They assist the country to meet its Kyoto protocol obligations. Fewer cars would be on the roads if railways became a serious alternative to
cars, coach operators and airlines. With rising fuel costs the passenger train will again come into its own and should not be dismissed as a service to be sacrificed on the altar of “company profits”.
Trains reduce road traffic and road repair costs as a consequence would be lower. Fewer car accidents would occur and there would be a decrease in indirect costs incurred by the presence of all the attendant emergency services. Trains are efficient people movers, they are a great way to travel, stress free and relaxing. Thrown into the mix is all that glorious New Zealand countryside, only to be enjoyed from the safety and comfort of the train. The sum of the hidden costs of all these losses to New Zealand would be far greater than the relatively minor loss of the one point seven million dollars per annum support funding requested from the government by Toll.
Would the Prime Minister and all the other inhabitants of the Beehive, ever be able to sleep easily again knowing that they had let this country down with their lack of vision, allowing this closure to happen on their watch? No doubt politicians would be delighted to explain to future generations, and perhaps their own grandchildren, just how easily they disinherited them.
Vision, belief, marketing and political will is all that is needed to put matters right. Yes! We all know that urban commuter services are handsomely profitable. Tie these profits back into the Overlander, in the full knowledge that the Overlander may never be as profitable as other rail sectors, though nevertheless an essential service to the community.
Then set fire to your imagination. Buy new stock and locomotives, rebuild old bridges, extend the overhead cables that are already there, improve the track. High-speed and Advanced Passenger Trains (APT’s) are very fashionable in Europe and in other countries.
Cut the journey time between Auckland and Wellington by fifty percent, create double track the length of the north island, trains can then pass each other at speed.
Create an identity and a marketing plan using only the best marketing companies available. Enthuse your customers, do things differently with shorter themed travel options such as steam engine weekends, forties weekends, create journeys from Taumarunui with it’s well served cafés via the Raurimu Spiral to National Park. Stop off at the excellent Station Café in National Park for lunch or refreshments as 35,000 railway passengers per annum currently do. Offer complete skiing packages on the mountain; create packages to the theatres and galleries in both Wellington and Auckland with luxury dining or themed visits to Te Papa to enjoy current exhibitions. Reinstate the Geyserland Express. Make it fun.
The list is endless. This is a marketing person’s dream opportunity. Keep the basic service as low cost as possible, undercut coach operators and airlines to draw passengers back, then keep them by offering repeat purchaser incentives with continuing low fares, above all, don’t become complacent, keep the interesting ideas coming and the railway will live.
Spend two billion dollars on the railways, create a service with a frequent schedule every day, invest for the future in the latest and most advanced stock available. Offer a genuine alternative to road and airline users. We are extremely well placed to benefit from this low cost, fuel efficient and relaxing form of service.
A key word that, “service”, old- fashioned maybe but the genuine hallmark of a civilised nation.
Labour has earmarked funding of twenty two point three billion dollars for its transport programme over the ten-year period commencing 2005. Call for the railway passenger service to benefit from a significantly increased proportion of this money. Take the railways out of private or “company“ hands with their governing “bottom-line” mentality, return them to state control where they belong and re-invest as a nation in the vision.
The future of the railways lies in our hands, write to your local MP objecting to the closure of the Overlander and make sure our government understands the depths of our outrage.
I have reproduced the whole text here as I believe this needs some airing
and hope that some of the good folks of the forum will understand my need to share this .
The New Zealand Herald (the main paper in NZ) have said they will print my article as it's topical, but I'll believe that when I see it.
Copies have also been sent to the Prime Minister and her deputy as well as the Minister responsible for railways so I now await their wrath .
If anyone is interested in the topic I shall report back from time to time.
The Overlander
“Labour is committed to developing a sustainable transport system that is safe, affordable, responsive to the needs of users, and which contributes to New Zealand’s economic development, as well as social and environmental goals. Achieving those goals depends on having a strong, integrated transport sector and good infrastructure.”
The opening vision statement of Labour’s 2005 transport policy seems attractive but it’s been conveniently forgotten in the case of the imminent closure of the Overlander passenger train service.
Where other forward thinking countries are pouring billions of dollars into updating their railway systems, New Zealand meanwhile chooses to close its only north island mainline passenger train. For example, China has recently completed a massive new railway project into Tibet at a cost of nearly seven billion dollars. Richard Branson in the UK is proposing to provide 320kph trains on the mainline between London and Edinburgh at an estimated cost of fifteen billion dollars. Countries as disparate as Brazil, Saudi Arabia and Malaysia are investing heavily in railway services.
Why has this happened? In New Zealand’s case the answer is simplistically short – political will, or more accurately, lack of political will.
The problem is deeply rooted in the evils of rail privatisation and the god of shareholder profits.
Take a look at all other forms of transport in New Zealand and you will see continuous governmental and non-governmental organisations improving and investing in transport, designed to offer the fastest, smoothest and latest way to transport people and goods throughout the country. The state supported airline carrier “Air New Zealand” is constantly updating their aircraft and improving them with new passenger comforts, more airlines are offering better and more frequent low cost services. Investment in shipping is increasing, look at the new Inter-Island ferry “Kaitaki” with it’s larger capacity, higher speeds and greater comfort.
Roads too are constantly being upgraded and improved, new motorways are being built, there are increased numbers of new cars, buses and lorries using the New Zealand road network. Billions of dollars from government coffers are being invested in New Zealand roads; these roads are then freely used by coach companies and freight lorries in direct competition to rail services. The same level of funding should be ploughed into railways to support the rail network and so create a level playing field. The UK is investing heavily in small lines through government investment, providing seed funding, creating partnerships between local government and community groups. The disused York to Hull railway line for example with no current track or infrastructure, is being invested in with eight hundred and seventy four million dollars set aside for rebuilding the line and providing stock. There is even a new mainline A1 Pacific express steam locomotive being built with private funding in the UK. New Zealand’s railways meanwhile have become the Cinderella of the transport sector still using carriages at least thirty years old; there is no apparent pride in the service, not even a lick of paint on the locomotives or other carriage stock.
What are the direct and immediate economic effects of the closure of the “Overlander” service?
Service businesses dotted throughout the length of the line and at the terminii will suffer substantially. Directly affected are small to medium enterprises such as the café at National Park set to lose 50% of its staff. Toll itself will have to re-deploy the thirty-five staff currently employed on the Overlander. The tourism infrastructure will be depleted in every small community throughout the length of the rail corridor. There will also be fewer travel options for tourist visitors. Couple this with the loss of a truly great train journey and the knock-on or hidden economic losses are not difficult to predict.
What price our identity and nationhood? What price our cultural heritage? The Overlander is first and foremost an iconic service, as much a part of the Kiwi identity as rugby or the beach in summer. This blow strikes at the very heart of our national psyche leaving us all breathless, unable to believe that something so Kiwi can be so lightly and easily lost forever, then to suffer the indignity of the facts being glossed over by Toll and the government with their “business speak”. The fascinating history of the railways in Taumarunui “On the Main Trunk Line” and the subsequent opening up of the Central North Island to loggers and other settlers, even to New Zealand itself, is invested in this line and it’s passenger service. There was no consultation with the public, no warning given, no information from government until we were presented with a fait accompli. Shame! We are the victims of grey men in grey suits with nothing else to offer other than grey ideas? Where are the politicians with vision, courage and marketing knowledge? Are we as a country only interested in short term solutions, the now rather than what could be, the “once and future” railways, the lack of political national pride is an unconscionable dereliction of duty to the electorate.
Trains are green and fuel-efficient. They assist the country to meet its Kyoto protocol obligations. Fewer cars would be on the roads if railways became a serious alternative to
cars, coach operators and airlines. With rising fuel costs the passenger train will again come into its own and should not be dismissed as a service to be sacrificed on the altar of “company profits”.
Trains reduce road traffic and road repair costs as a consequence would be lower. Fewer car accidents would occur and there would be a decrease in indirect costs incurred by the presence of all the attendant emergency services. Trains are efficient people movers, they are a great way to travel, stress free and relaxing. Thrown into the mix is all that glorious New Zealand countryside, only to be enjoyed from the safety and comfort of the train. The sum of the hidden costs of all these losses to New Zealand would be far greater than the relatively minor loss of the one point seven million dollars per annum support funding requested from the government by Toll.
Would the Prime Minister and all the other inhabitants of the Beehive, ever be able to sleep easily again knowing that they had let this country down with their lack of vision, allowing this closure to happen on their watch? No doubt politicians would be delighted to explain to future generations, and perhaps their own grandchildren, just how easily they disinherited them.
Vision, belief, marketing and political will is all that is needed to put matters right. Yes! We all know that urban commuter services are handsomely profitable. Tie these profits back into the Overlander, in the full knowledge that the Overlander may never be as profitable as other rail sectors, though nevertheless an essential service to the community.
Then set fire to your imagination. Buy new stock and locomotives, rebuild old bridges, extend the overhead cables that are already there, improve the track. High-speed and Advanced Passenger Trains (APT’s) are very fashionable in Europe and in other countries.
Cut the journey time between Auckland and Wellington by fifty percent, create double track the length of the north island, trains can then pass each other at speed.
Create an identity and a marketing plan using only the best marketing companies available. Enthuse your customers, do things differently with shorter themed travel options such as steam engine weekends, forties weekends, create journeys from Taumarunui with it’s well served cafés via the Raurimu Spiral to National Park. Stop off at the excellent Station Café in National Park for lunch or refreshments as 35,000 railway passengers per annum currently do. Offer complete skiing packages on the mountain; create packages to the theatres and galleries in both Wellington and Auckland with luxury dining or themed visits to Te Papa to enjoy current exhibitions. Reinstate the Geyserland Express. Make it fun.
The list is endless. This is a marketing person’s dream opportunity. Keep the basic service as low cost as possible, undercut coach operators and airlines to draw passengers back, then keep them by offering repeat purchaser incentives with continuing low fares, above all, don’t become complacent, keep the interesting ideas coming and the railway will live.
Spend two billion dollars on the railways, create a service with a frequent schedule every day, invest for the future in the latest and most advanced stock available. Offer a genuine alternative to road and airline users. We are extremely well placed to benefit from this low cost, fuel efficient and relaxing form of service.
A key word that, “service”, old- fashioned maybe but the genuine hallmark of a civilised nation.
Labour has earmarked funding of twenty two point three billion dollars for its transport programme over the ten-year period commencing 2005. Call for the railway passenger service to benefit from a significantly increased proportion of this money. Take the railways out of private or “company“ hands with their governing “bottom-line” mentality, return them to state control where they belong and re-invest as a nation in the vision.
The future of the railways lies in our hands, write to your local MP objecting to the closure of the Overlander and make sure our government understands the depths of our outrage.