Calamity Junction

This forum is for the discussion of all railway subjects that do not include the LNER, and its constituent companies.

Moderators: 52D, Tom F, Rlangham, Atlantic 3279, Blink Bonny, Saint Johnstoun, richard

hq1hitchin
LNER V2 2-6-2 'Green Arrow'
Posts: 1162
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 8:32 pm
Location: Newbury, Berks

Calamity Junction

Post by hq1hitchin »

For those interested, several things not quite right here - just don't ask me to list them all!
Attachments
calamity[1].jpg
A topper is proper if the train's a non-stopper!
User avatar
R. pike
GNR C1 4-4-2
Posts: 765
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 1:21 pm
Location: just off the GN mainline
Contact:

Re: Calamity Junction

Post by R. pike »

9...yikes!

I wont say too much just yet but this looks fun!
User avatar
Autocar Publicity
NER C7 4-4-2
Posts: 847
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 1:36 pm
Location: Yorkshire

Re: Calamity Junction

Post by Autocar Publicity »

Where did that come from? Did you find it somewhere or did you devise it yourself?
Bryan
LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
Posts: 2224
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 6:48 pm
Location: York

Re: Calamity Junction

Post by Bryan »

At a guess it would be part of a test paper for an S+T exam.
User avatar
R. pike
GNR C1 4-4-2
Posts: 765
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 1:21 pm
Location: just off the GN mainline
Contact:

Re: Calamity Junction

Post by R. pike »

Can i list all that's wrong yet?
hq1hitchin
LNER V2 2-6-2 'Green Arrow'
Posts: 1162
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 8:32 pm
Location: Newbury, Berks

Re: Calamity Junction

Post by hq1hitchin »

Autocar Publicity wrote:Where did that come from? Did you find it somewhere or did you devise it yourself?
I'm nowhere near clever enough for that! Suspect it was drawn by some whimsical signalling engineer...

Mr P - feel free to list what you have found. The RAIB got nine faults too, so I believe
A topper is proper if the train's a non-stopper!
User avatar
R. pike
GNR C1 4-4-2
Posts: 765
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 1:21 pm
Location: just off the GN mainline
Contact:

Re: Calamity Junction

Post by R. pike »

1&2 ok
3 ok
4 locked by the block? I don't think so.
5 should be locked by the block
6 ok
7 ok
8 ok
9 as i said earlier...yikes..
10 ok
11 the points don't lie correctly..
12 ok
13 ok
14 ok
15 looks to be drawn as a fixed distant
16 stop arm below distant
17 ok
18 Rule 55 diamond on a distant.
At the London end, up and down mains transposed.
1,2 and 4 signals do not protect the crossover
Track circuit 1 is not a lot of use if it track locks 8 lever. If 1,2 and 4 were correctly placed it would lock the crossover if a train stopped there.

I make that 10 though to be fair 4/5 should count as one.. I'll have another look in a bit as i'm sure there are more.
User avatar
StevieG
LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
Posts: 2353
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 9:08 pm
Location: Near the GN main line in N.Herts.

Re: Calamity Junction

Post by StevieG »

I haven't spotted any more so far, RP.
BZOH

/
\ \ \ //\ \
/// \ \ \ \
User avatar
R. pike
GNR C1 4-4-2
Posts: 765
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 1:21 pm
Location: just off the GN mainline
Contact:

Re: Calamity Junction

Post by R. pike »

Ok after much thought, how about this?..

11 trap on the up goods. Maybe this should be worked by the spare lever to maintain run back protection from the up goods? The facing end of 11 will be locked in the position shown as flank protection for 12 when a movement is made from the down goods to down main. If 11 trap was worked by lever 6 the up main can be protected from a run back but when worked as a pair this protection is removed..<g>

An example of this can be found at Sleaford South Junction. There is a trap in the down avoiding line worked as a slotted joint, basically a sprung trap point that can be pulled over to allow facing movements over it..
Mickey

Re: Calamity Junction

Post by Mickey »

Deleted
Last edited by Mickey on Tue Apr 29, 2014 2:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
R. pike
GNR C1 4-4-2
Posts: 765
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 1:21 pm
Location: just off the GN mainline
Contact:

Re: Calamity Junction

Post by R. pike »

Micky wrote:I know in regards to CALAMITY JUNCTION there WOULDN'T be a YELLOW disc signal where that one is situated it would be a RED disc signal but i just thought it worth mentioning.
Hence my comment of 'yikes'...
Mickey

Re: Calamity Junction

Post by Mickey »

Deleted
Last edited by Mickey on Tue Apr 29, 2014 2:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
R. pike
GNR C1 4-4-2
Posts: 765
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 1:21 pm
Location: just off the GN mainline
Contact:

Re: Calamity Junction

Post by R. pike »

http://richard2890.fotopic.net/p55751112.html

Check out 17 and 39 outside the farm..
User avatar
StevieG
LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
Posts: 2353
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 9:08 pm
Location: Near the GN main line in N.Herts.

Re: Calamity Junction

Post by StevieG »

It was certainly rare to have a yellow disc facing oncoming traffic travelling normal direction on a running line (that Hitchin South 17, which I remeber seeing was also still a GN 'revolver' 'disc' signal).
BZOH

/
\ \ \ //\ \
/// \ \ \ \
Mickey

Re: Calamity Junction

Post by Mickey »

Deleted
Last edited by Mickey on Tue Apr 29, 2014 2:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply