Norton on Tees Incident

This forum is for the discussion of all railway subjects that do not include the LNER, and its constituent companies.

Moderators: 52D, Tom F, Rlangham, Atlantic 3279, Blink Bonny, Saint Johnstoun, richard

PinzaC55
LNER A3 4-6-2
Posts: 1381
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 2:36 pm

Re: Norton on Tees Incident

Post by PinzaC55 »

Micky wrote:
PinzaC55 wrote:This bit
"The driver involved was experienced, having worked for a freight train
operator for six years before joining Grand Central Railway. Although it had not
been responsible for his original training, Grand Central Railway had assessed
the driver’s competence in semaphore signalling, but had not identified that he
did not fully understand the meaning of the configuration that he encountered on
2 December 2009."
is particularly amazing in that a driver with 6 years previous experience didn't understand a common signal configuration.
It is and it isn't PinzaC55, considering in British Rail days of the 1970s ALL driver's started as secondmen and had to at the very least 2 years as a secondman before they could go up for driving and that was the exception most secondmen would do 5 or 6 as a secondman before they went up for driving and even then after passing there rules & regs and going on a traction training course at Ilford to learn various traction units such as class 08 diesel shunters and class 31s they would only be a 'passed secondman' and would probably only get light engine movements, yard shunting and maybe ECS diagrams for there first year out as a driver until they were promoted into the lower driver's links.

Nowadays they take people 'off the street' (same in the signalling grade) put them through driving course and after a certain number of months they are out driving!. Sometimes the old ways of doing it was better me thinks. :wink:
Oh yeah I was well familiar with "Boil In The Bags" when I was working out of London Bridge and I could tell a number of tales of their exploits none of which, curiously, made it to the newspapers since they were normally given the option to resign.
On the flip side at Kings Cross the secondmen essentially had nothing to do most of the time. I suppose there should have been a happy medium between the two. As recently as 2004 I was talking to a young driver doing his route learning via Harrogate and I mentioned something about Key Token working and, judging by his blank look, he had no idea what I was on about.
52A
LNER V2 2-6-2 'Green Arrow'
Posts: 1107
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 10:50 am

Re: Norton on Tees Incident

Post by 52A »

Well this is a fine kettle of fish! Drivers who don't understand signals, signalmen who create their own rules, "managers" who haven't a clue what's going on and an incident report written by schoolboys for infants!
Mickey

Re: Norton on Tees Incident

Post by Mickey »

52A wrote:Well this is a fine kettle of fish! Drivers who don't understand signals, signalmen who create their own rules, "managers" who haven't a clue what's going on and an incident report written by schoolboys for infants!
Welcome to the nightmare world of Britains railways 2013 style folks!!. Probably get sir Richard Branson appointed as (unelected) minister for transport next?. :roll:
Andy W
GER D14 4-4-0 'Claud Hamilton'
Posts: 388
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2009 9:25 pm

Re: Norton on Tees Incident

Post by Andy W »

I don't think anyone really likes this "railways for dummies" style of writing but the RAIB don't seem to have much choice in it for it seems to be a government standard these days in so many differing fields. Personally, I find it really grates.

If you think this one is bad enough then hold onto your hats for the Stafford SPAD report when it comes out. If the strong rumours that went round the industry when it happened are anywhere near true, it will be one not to miss. I await that one with much interest.
Post Reply