Beeching report

This forum is for the discussion of all railway subjects that do not include the LNER, and its constituent companies.

Moderators: 52D, Tom F, Rlangham, Atlantic 3279, Blink Bonny, Saint Johnstoun, richard

Iron Duke
GER D14 4-4-0 'Claud Hamilton'
Posts: 374
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 11:30 pm
Location: Twixt Grantham & Lincoln

Re: Beeching report

Post by Iron Duke »

News item relating to Beeching 50 years on (ref KX)

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-21951560

ID
User avatar
StevieG
LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
Posts: 2353
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 9:08 pm
Location: Near the GN main line in N.Herts.

Re: Beeching report

Post by StevieG »

Thanks very much for that link, ID.

Seems hard to believe that that control panel, working 80 route miles of 'the GN', had became completely operational 36 years ago, in stages from 1975-77, was said at the time to have replaced 57* boxes, and that now, the scheme's signalling system (installed in local stages from 1970-77) is thus itself probably reaching its originally planned life-expectancy.

( * - E.g., by 1970 there were still 23 [or 24**] boxes in the first 5.5 miles of the KX area, out to Bounds Green, with 8 more having only gone in the preceding 10 years. Roughly around 1910, firmly in the GNR era, the total had been higher still, by around 4 - 6.)
........... [** - if the non-block post Five Arch Bridge cabin is included.]
BZOH

/
\ \ \ //\ \
/// \ \ \ \
52A
LNER V2 2-6-2 'Green Arrow'
Posts: 1107
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 10:50 am

Re: Beeching report

Post by 52A »

To be replaced I believe with cab signalling.
PinzaC55
LNER A3 4-6-2
Posts: 1381
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 2:36 pm

Re: Beeching report

Post by PinzaC55 »

limitofshunt wrote:Oh dear.

It's 50 years on. When will people stop living in the past? There are more important things to worry about than what may or may not have been.
Because those who do not learn from history are condemned to repeat it.
PinzaC55
LNER A3 4-6-2
Posts: 1381
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 2:36 pm

Re: Beeching report

Post by PinzaC55 »

Iron Duke wrote:News item relating to Beeching 50 years on (ref KX)

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-21951560

ID
The new York Control Centre which will replace Kings Cross box is already being built.
User avatar
manna
LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
Posts: 3862
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 12:56 am
Location: All over Australia

Re: Beeching report

Post by manna »

G'Day Gents

Funny how the old mechanical boxes lasted for over a hundred years, in some cases, but the 'new' box, probably won't get to it's 40th birthday. :mrgreen:

manna
EDGWARE GN, Steam in the Suburbs.
watcheronthebridge
LNER J94 0-6-0ST Austerity
Posts: 39
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2013 10:34 am

Re: Beeching report

Post by watcheronthebridge »

So fifty years after Beeching we have this - Network Rail's Strategic business plans 2014-19, a better railway for a better Britain which can be accessed at this page http://www.networkrail.co.uk/publicatio ... n-for-cp5/. Nice to see that the LNER sort of lives on, as the London and North Eastern Route!
User avatar
strang steel
LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
Posts: 2363
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 3:54 pm
Location: From 40F to near 82A via 88C

Re: Beeching report

Post by strang steel »

Iron Duke wrote:News item relating to Beeching 50 years on (ref KX)

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-21951560

ID
We do get very nostalgic about closed country branch lines, but the harsh reality is that few people were using them even in the 1950s.

In a lot of cases, the irony was that many more people travelled on the 'last day' services, than had done on the regular timetabled trains in a month. It was a sure case of not knowing what you have had until it has gone.
John.

My spotting log website is at https://spottinglogs.co.uk/spotting-rec ... s-70s-80s/

And my spotters' b&w photo site is at http://spottinglogs.blog
Iron Duke
GER D14 4-4-0 'Claud Hamilton'
Posts: 374
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 11:30 pm
Location: Twixt Grantham & Lincoln

Re: Beeching report

Post by Iron Duke »

My own experience of this was a "main" line.
A collection of lads (myself included) being told by a ticket collector that we would have to give up train spotting due the station (Ruddington on the ex GCR) being closed. The word among local railway men was that this was something to do with the "midland" wanting to finally get rid of the intruder into Nottingham. To all purposes Nottingham is now on a branch line............
sandwhich
GER D14 4-4-0 'Claud Hamilton'
Posts: 327
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2011 3:05 pm

Re: Beeching report

Post by sandwhich »

No doubt future generations many years hence from now will still be discussing the rights and wrongs of Beeching and his report. You cannot fault some of his ideas. The start of what became Inter City was one although this became bigger than he anticipated. Freightliner was another good idea. Before his time wagonload traffic was going onto the roads and the laying out of huge marshalling yards in the 1950s was much criticised at the time, it was an albatross which within 10 years had become an embarrasment, a mess he inherited, it was the early 1980s before it was sorted out to the system that we have today although not without its faults. The rail closures were not thought out to well as has been proved but lets be honest some it would have happened anyway. The 1960s and early 70s were not good for railways in general despite faster train services. It was the coming of the HSTs in 1976-79 that started the more positive outlook towards railways.
PinzaC55
LNER A3 4-6-2
Posts: 1381
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 2:36 pm

Re: Beeching report

Post by PinzaC55 »

strang steel wrote:
Iron Duke wrote:News item relating to Beeching 50 years on (ref KX)

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-21951560

ID
We do get very nostalgic about closed country branch lines, but the harsh reality is that few people were using them even in the 1950s.

In a lot of cases, the irony was that many more people travelled on the 'last day' services, than had done on the regular timetabled trains in a month. It was a sure case of not knowing what you have had until it has gone.
It wasn't simply about stations but through services. I have a 1970's book by the Railway Invigoration Society which looks at Beeching in some detail; they point out that most of the bus services which were supposedly a replacement for the railways withered away shortly after the lines closed, leaving anyone without private transport unable to reach their destination. In the case of the Spalding - Boston - Skegness service one of the reasons given was that it was "only busy in the summer". After closure major upgrades to the Spalding - Skegness road were announced - wait for it - "to cope with summer traffic".
When did you last hear of a road being closed and torn up because not enough people used it?
Danby Wiske
GCR D11 4-4-0 'Improved Director'
Posts: 413
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2012 12:09 am

Re: Beeching report

Post by Danby Wiske »

sandwhich wrote:It was the coming of the HSTs in 1976-79 that started the more positive outlook towards railways.
Not forgetting, of course, the part played by Mr Savile... :oops:
Mickey

Re: Beeching report

Post by Mickey »

Deleted
Last edited by Mickey on Mon Apr 28, 2014 3:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
strang steel
LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
Posts: 2363
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 3:54 pm
Location: From 40F to near 82A via 88C

Re: Beeching report

Post by strang steel »

Here is a clip from that presentation:-

http://youtu.be/mUhMXnoCUCk
John.

My spotting log website is at https://spottinglogs.co.uk/spotting-rec ... s-70s-80s/

And my spotters' b&w photo site is at http://spottinglogs.blog
User avatar
Kestrel
NER C7 4-4-2
Posts: 899
Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2011 1:13 am

Re: Beeching report

Post by Kestrel »

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... s-ago.html

The following lists the lines that were to be closed. Some survived including the Liverpool to Southport line although Liverpool Exchange closed and the line runs as part of the Liverpool city centre loop line.

http://britishrailways.info/BEECHING%20CLOSURES.htm
Post Reply