Kent and East Sussex Railway. Their extension

This forum is for the discussion of all railway subjects that do not include the LNER, and its constituent companies.

Moderators: 52D, Tom F, Rlangham, Atlantic 3279, Blink Bonny, Saint Johnstoun, richard

Coboman
GCR O4 2-8-0 'ROD'
Posts: 510
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 4:23 am
Location: GNR outpost

Re: Kent and East Sussex Railway. Their extension

Post by Coboman »

I do find this attitude (by the autorities, not users on here!!!!) towards level crossings totally rediculous. I can't see anything wrong with a level crossing with full barriers. How far do we have to go to try and protect utter idiots?
Its good to know where you stand. Saves making a fool of yourself later......
cambois
GNSR D40 4-4-0
Posts: 204
Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2010 10:04 pm
Location: Dunblane

Re: Kent and East Sussex Railway. Their extension

Post by cambois »

Regretably a very long and expensive way - BUT as network Operators do not yet treat the road/pedestrian issues as seriously as the rail side it will be a struggle. Compare the performance with signal sighting compared with the approach to road traffic sign sighting and deveging (or not) of farm/pedestrian crossings.

NR are now trying hard, but there is a long way to go
PinzaC55
LNER A3 4-6-2
Posts: 1381
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 2:36 pm

Re: Kent and East Sussex Railway. Their extension

Post by PinzaC55 »

Coboman wrote:I do find this attitude (by the autorities, not users on here!!!!) towards level crossings totally rediculous. I can't see anything wrong with a level crossing with full barriers. How far do we have to go to try and protect utter idiots?
Its basically a knee jerk reaction by the authorities to media coverage of level crossing accidents. When a member of the public misuses a crossing and is killed, its very hard for the authorities to simply say "it was their own fault" so it is politically easier to find some reason why the railway was at fault.
West_Stanley
LNER N2 0-6-2T
Posts: 54
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2012 1:17 am

Re: Kent and East Sussex Railway. Their extension

Post by West_Stanley »

Coboman wrote:I do find this attitude (by the autorities, not users on here!!!!) towards level crossings totally rediculous. I can't see anything wrong with a level crossing with full barriers. How far do we have to go to try and protect utter idiots?
Add to that, the intolerance of some road users who object to having their journey delayed by a "hobby" railway and local authorities over-reaction towards potential traffic jams
Post Reply