The other streamlined Pacific engines

This forum is for the discussion of all railway subjects that do not include the LNER, and its constituent companies.

Moderators: 52D, Tom F, Rlangham, Atlantic 3279, Blink Bonny, Saint Johnstoun, richard

Post Reply
drmditch

The other streamlined Pacific engines

Post by drmditch »

A question I've been meaning to ask for some time, and perhaps someone who knows more about the LMS might have the answer.

'Duchess of Hamilton' as splendidly re-streamlined has boiler handrails in the usual (ish) position. However, there is no footplate which might make the handrails useful.
Does anybody have any idea why they were there?
User avatar
2002EarlMarischal
LNER A3 4-6-2
Posts: 1402
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 11:18 pm
Location: Burbage

Re: The other streamlined Pacific engines

Post by 2002EarlMarischal »

We all know that the A4s were streamlined inside and out by design, the Coronations weren't.

Perhaps the handrails were just there because "locos have handrails", or maybe they knew the casing might not last?
Bryan
LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
Posts: 2224
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 6:48 pm
Location: York

Re: The other streamlined Pacific engines

Post by Bryan »

Were toe holes provided, possibly?
third-rail
GCR O4 2-8-0 'ROD'
Posts: 567
Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 10:47 pm
Location: Earsdon Grange sub station

Re: The other streamlined Pacific engines

Post by third-rail »

Could be for putting a ladder against to assist with cleaning, as when built most staff would be wearing leather boots with studs in, standing on that slope would be difficult without slipping off.plus the paint shop would not happy having to keep a prestige locomotive looking smart.
drmditch

Re: The other streamlined Pacific engines

Post by drmditch »

Thank you. The use for ladders would seem to make sense.
User avatar
Blink Bonny
LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
Posts: 3946
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 9:21 pm
Location: The Midlands
Contact:

Re: The other streamlined Pacific engines

Post by Blink Bonny »

Ay up!

It is certainly a matter of record that Stanier did not like the idea of streamlining at all. His proposals for streamlining the Princess class were singularly ugly (IMHO) and possibly designed deliberately to turn the LMS directors against the idea? Who knows. Her certainly saw it as a mere "Fad" and foresaw the removal of streamlining, hence possibly his decision to produce both streamlined and non-streamlined versions of the class.

Now - here's an idea. Would there be so many A4s preserved has the streamlining been removed?
If I ain't here, I'm in Bilston, scoffing decent chips at last!!!!
Post Reply