2 sides to this argument.
Which side do you feel it should be?
http://www.dunfermlinepress.com/news/ro ... tatus-bid/
Britarch Item today
Moderators: 52D, Tom F, Rlangham, Atlantic 3279, Blink Bonny, Saint Johnstoun, richard
-
52D
- LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
- Posts: 3968
- Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 3:50 pm
- Location: Reallocated now between the Lickey and GWR
- Contact:
Re: Britarch Item today
Yes two distinct points of view. My feelings are as its a working structure and not an antique it should not have UNESCO status. Surely major changes to the bridge would require planning permission anyway.
The bridge could be better promoted having a viewing area and catering/souvenir outlets like the Humber bridge, that might give a few more jobs to locals and bring in a few tourist dollars.
The bridge could be better promoted having a viewing area and catering/souvenir outlets like the Humber bridge, that might give a few more jobs to locals and bring in a few tourist dollars.
Hi interested in the area served by 52D. also researching colliery wagonways from same area.