SR Q1 at Harringay West
Moderators: 52D, Tom F, Rlangham, Atlantic 3279, Blink Bonny, Saint Johnstoun, richard
SR Q1 at Harringay West
Hi all,
First post - and is a subject that has been bugging me for ages. I was a regular spotter around Harringay c.1960. I have seen a picture in a book (but I can't remember the title!) of a Q1 at Harringay at the foot of the viaduct waiting to 'bank' a J50 over to the Ferme Park yard. I have recollections of seeing these beasts on the Gospel Oak line which passed close to our house. There is a connection to the ECML there; please someone, let me out of my misery and confirm this - or deny it and prove that I am really starting to lose it...
First post - and is a subject that has been bugging me for ages. I was a regular spotter around Harringay c.1960. I have seen a picture in a book (but I can't remember the title!) of a Q1 at Harringay at the foot of the viaduct waiting to 'bank' a J50 over to the Ferme Park yard. I have recollections of seeing these beasts on the Gospel Oak line which passed close to our house. There is a connection to the ECML there; please someone, let me out of my misery and confirm this - or deny it and prove that I am really starting to lose it...
Re: SR Q1 at Harringay West
From memory i think there is a photograph of a southern Q1 0-6-0 opposite Harringay West station at Harringay Up Goods (box) in the book called King's Cross Line side 1958-1984 by David Percival published by Ian Alan.petelmrg wrote: Hi all,
First post - and is a subject that has been bugging me for ages. I was a regular spotter around Harringay c.1960. I have seen a picture in a book (but I can't remember the title!) of a Q1 at Harringay at the foot of the viaduct waiting to 'bank' a J50 over to the Ferme Park yard. I have recollections of seeing these beasts on the Gospel Oak line which passed close to our house. There is a connection to the ECML there; please someone, let me out of my misery and confirm this - or deny it and prove that I am really starting to lose it...
Mickey
Re: SR Q1 at Harringay West
The Bulleid Q1s were certainly used on the many transfer goods trains between Feltham and other yards for the WR and also LMR and ER. In the latter case most went to Hornsey. From the Southern all this traffic went via the North & South Western Junction route, not sure how it got to Hornsey, but some of the North London looks likely. Your memory looks in good order to me, at least!
John
John
Re: SR Q1 at Harringay West
It came off the southern region at Old Kew Junction then went via the N&SWJ through Kew East Jn, South Acton Jn, Acton Wells Jn, and then the North London line through Willesden High Level Jn, Kensal Green Jn, Finchley Road, Hampstead Heath, Gospel Oak then the Tottenham & Hampstead line via Junction Road Jn, Upper Holloway, Crouch Hill & Harringay Park Jn and then via the 'Harringay curve' onto the GN and Ferme Park yards.JASd17 wrote:The Bulleid Q1s were certainly used on the many transfer goods trains between Feltham and other yards for the WR and also LMR and ER. In the latter case most went to Hornsey. From the Southern all this traffic went via the North & South Western Junction route, not sure how it got to Hornsey, but some of the North London looks likely. Your memory looks in good order to me, at least!
Mickey
-
- NER J27 0-6-0
- Posts: 139
- Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 8:44 pm
Re: SR Q1 at Harringay West
The Middleton Press book, Kings Cross to Potters Bar, has a photo of a Q1 outside Harringey Up Goods Signal Box having transversed the Harringay Viaduct.
Re: SR Q1 at Harringay West
The North London WT for 1953 (published in District Controller's View No 13, Xpress Publishing) shows only one Southern-hauled working to Ferme Park, and that is a Q from Norwood, an overnight train, the loco returning light engine. The only other Southern loco workings to ER destinations (excluding Neasden) were three to Temple Mills - just 1 Q1 and 2 700s.
Workings may have changed by the 60s (certainly Q1s gradually replaced the 700s), or maybe the Q1 on the GN was unusual. But I'm sure petelmrg shouldn't be doubting his memory.
Kudu
Workings may have changed by the 60s (certainly Q1s gradually replaced the 700s), or maybe the Q1 on the GN was unusual. But I'm sure petelmrg shouldn't be doubting his memory.
Kudu
Re: SR Q1 at Harringay West
Those southern 0-6-0 'Biscuit tins' were ugly buggers, possibly the only case of a loco tender being better looking than it's loco??.
Mickey
Mickey
Re: SR Q1 at Harringay West
Thanks very much all for your observations - and the name of the book. I feel as though a little of my sanity is still intact!
Re: SR Q1 at Harringay West
They remind me of an armadillo.FINSBURY PARK 5 wrote:Those southern 0-6-0 'Biscuit tins' were ugly buggers, possibly the only case of a loco tender being better looking than it's loco??.
Mickey
You look at this one and ask how can it be as battered as that. https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=bulle ... c07mTkM%3A
Re: SR Q1 at Harringay West
Yes they do Kestrel but they kind of blended in well on the southern region along with there concrete station buildings and southern EMUs.Kestrel wrote:FINSBURY PARK 5 wrote:Those southern 0-6-0 'Biscuit tins' were ugly buggers, possibly the only case of a loco tender being better looking than it's loco??.Kestrel wrote:They remind me of an armadillo.
From Mr.Bulleid's 'Ugly ducklings' to his finest locos his 4-6-2 'spam cans' (light pacifics) of the West Country & Battle of Britains classes in either there un-rebuilt or rebuilt forms, i've always liked those locos.
ps...but don't mention The Leader class though.
Mickey
Re: SR Q1 at Harringay West
Have to disagree. They are quite beautiful in their own way. But they are less functional than they appear. With no running boards you need ladders or stilts to clean them.FINSBURY PARK 5 wrote:Those southern 0-6-0 'Biscuit tins' were ugly buggers, possibly the only case of a loco tender being better looking than it's loco??.
Mickey
Kudu
Re: SR Q1 at Harringay West
Yeah i know wot you mean Kudu in someways the Q1s looked alright working on the southern region amongst Bulleid 'spam cans' as well as Maunsell mixed traffic 4-6-0s & B.R. 2-6-2 & 2-6-4 standard tanks and such like but overall compared to many other british loco designs they didn't look to good up against some of them.kudu wrote:Have to disagree. They are quite beautiful in their own way. But they are less functional than they appear. With no running boards you need ladders or stilts to clean them.FINSBURY PARK 5 wrote:Those southern 0-6-0 'Biscuit tins' were ugly buggers, possibly the only case of a loco tender being better looking than it's loco??.
Mickey
Kudu
Mickey