Another LNER Moquette question

This forum is for the discussion of the LNER, its constituent companies, and their histories.

Moderators: 52D, Tom F, Rlangham, Atlantic 3279, Blink Bonny, Saint Johnstoun, richard

Trestrol
GCR D11 4-4-0 'Improved Director'
Posts: 456
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2008 7:48 pm
Location: Earsdon Grange signal box

Re: Another LNER Moquette question

Post by Trestrol »

sawdust wrote:
60044 wrote:You'll have had so much practice at it that you'll be able to do the same in the CK so much quicker when we come to it.

The bad news is that the CK is next, the good news is there are no more Thompsons to do after it!
But the good news is also that there is less of it!

Sawdust.
Why because most of it has rotted away or because its on a shorter underframe? :D
User avatar
sawdust
GCR D11 4-4-0 'Improved Director'
Posts: 423
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 7:27 pm
Location: North Yorkshire

Re: Another LNER Moquette question

Post by sawdust »

Well it is shorter but there is less rotten framing than on the TK.

Sawdust.
Post Reply