Talking Sacrilege???

This forum is for the discussion of railway modelling of the LNER and its constituent companies.

Moderators: 52D, Tom F, Rlangham, Atlantic 3279, Blink Bonny, Saint Johnstoun, richard

Post Reply
User avatar
Norman Coyne
GER J70 0-6-0T Tram
Posts: 18
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2006 12:23 am
Location: Alberta, Canada

Talking Sacrilege???

Post by Norman Coyne »

I want to have an A2/3 & a Peppercorn A2 on my layout. How wrong would it look if I renamed/numbered a Peppercorn A1? To my uneducated eye the differences aren't that great.
User avatar
Bullhead
LNER Thompson B1 4-6-0 'Antelope'
Posts: 633
Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2006 9:40 pm
Location: 52D

Post by Bullhead »

I reckon the whole point of railway modelling - or any other hobby, for that matter - is to bring happiness to the person doing it. It's your model railway; they're your eyes. So if you're happy with the compromise you suggest, that's the end of the argument, isn't it?
So - did anyone dare tell Stephenson, "It's not Rocket science"?
User avatar
richard
LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
Posts: 3390
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 5:11 pm
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas
Contact:

Post by richard »

Paraphrasing Bullhead, there are in fact two rules to model railways:

1.) Have fun!

2.) It is my damn railway, and I'll do what I want :-)


We all have to make compromises, and it is a personal decision where you make that compromise.


Back to your question, one of the more significant differences between the A1 and A2 was the wheel size. The A1s also seem grander, to me anyway. I guess we'll see if that is true when Tornado and Blue Peter are eventually placed next to each other...


Richard
Richard Marsden
LNER Encyclopedia
User avatar
Bullhead
LNER Thompson B1 4-6-0 'Antelope'
Posts: 633
Joined: Sun Jan 22, 2006 9:40 pm
Location: 52D

Post by Bullhead »

richard wrote:Paraphrasing Bullhead
The little-known sequel to Educating Rita. :lol:
So - did anyone dare tell Stephenson, "It's not Rocket science"?
Post Reply