LNER 2-10-2

This forum is for the discussion of the locomotives, motive power, and rolling stock of the LNER and its constituent companies.

Moderators: 52D, Tom F, Rlangham, Atlantic 3279, Blink Bonny, Saint Johnstoun, richard

Post Reply
Clock O' the North
LNER N2 0-6-2T
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 9:54 pm

LNER 2-10-2

Post by Clock O' the North »

Hello
Just a quick question. Does anyone have any line drawings for the 2-10-2 mentioned in the P1 history?(Here:http://www.lner.info/locos/P/p1.php). If so can you please post them on this thread.
Thanks CotN
4812
LNER J94 0-6-0ST Austerity
Posts: 47
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2016 5:18 pm

Re: LNER 2-10-2

Post by 4812 »

Never seen a drawing but some time ago a photo appeared in I think 'Railway World'. It looked remarkably like a stretched P2.
Hatfield Shed
LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
Posts: 1728
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 3:34 pm

Re: LNER 2-10-2

Post by Hatfield Shed »

What to stretch is the point at issue! I have a never-wazza project in hand which shall be a fusion of a now redundant Hornby 2-10-0 mechanism with the addition of a trailing truck into a GBL A2 body. This requires at least an extra half inch adding to the smokebox length to look decently proportioned, otherwise it has a truly immense expanse of front platform above the somewhat lengthened forward frames.
earlswood nob
LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
Posts: 1669
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 9:23 am
Location: Surrey

Re: LNER 2-10-2

Post by earlswood nob »

Good morning all

I believe the 2-10-2 was an A1 boiler with a chassis using 4ft8ins wheels at close 5ft0ins spacing. This would give a P1 with a ten coupled chassis.

It should be possible for neverwazza's to scratchbuild a chassis to suit. The BR 9F chassis with 5ft2in wheels at 5ft5ins spacing would be 7mm too long
(in 00).

Earlswood nob
Pebbles
GER D14 4-4-0 'Claud Hamilton'
Posts: 356
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 7:26 pm

Re: LNER 2-10-2

Post by Pebbles »

If the proposal were for a three cylinder type with conjugated valve gear I see problems. Generally with the conjugated valve gear arrangement the closest spacing between the first and second driving wheels was 6' 6" to enable the middle con rod to clear the leading axle. A second issue would be the very short con rods with 5ft wheel spacings. It is possible that divided drive was contemplated but this would still have resulted in a very short con rod for the middle cylinder. I appreciate that Decapod overcame some of these issues but was a complex one off engine!
User avatar
Atlantic 3279
LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
Posts: 6658
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 9:51 am
Location: 2850, 245

Re: LNER 2-10-2

Post by Atlantic 3279 »

The very point that I was about to raise. Maybe that was the killer.
Most subjects, models and techniques covered in this thread are now listed in various categories on page1

Dec. 2018: Almost all images that disappeared from my own thread following loss of free remote hosting are now restored.
earlswood nob
LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
Posts: 1669
Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2010 9:23 am
Location: Surrey

Re: LNER 2-10-2

Post by earlswood nob »

Afternoon all

I got the info on the 2-10-2 from the Green Books.

Perhaps, it was originally laid out for a two cylinder loco, but Gresley preferring three cylinder locos, changed to the P1 arrangement.

The P1 and U1 were built around the same time.

The U1 banker was planned as two two cylinder loco units, but Gresley changed it to two three cylinder loco units.

Earlswood nob
Hatfield Shed
LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
Posts: 1728
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 3:34 pm

Re: LNER 2-10-2

Post by Hatfield Shed »

Pebbles wrote:If the proposal were for a three cylinder type with conjugated valve gear I see problems. Generally with the conjugated valve gear arrangement the closest spacing between the first and second driving wheels was 6' 6" to enable the middle con rod to clear the leading axle. A second issue would be the very short con rods with 5ft wheel spacings...
In my case it has clearance cranked 1st and 2nd axles, definitely. All hidden inside out of sight. The sign peculiar should be no externally visible balance weights on those wheelsets, as the crank webs may be used for the balancing.
Pebbles
GER D14 4-4-0 'Claud Hamilton'
Posts: 356
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 7:26 pm

Re: LNER 2-10-2

Post by Pebbles »

Not entirely sure that cranked axles would work, also three types of varying throw would be required, the throw reducing the closer the axle was to the crosshead. Whilst the two leading cranked axles could possibly clear the con rod when at their lowest position at their highest point - because the diameter of the crank is added to the external radius of the throw - I imagine they would almost certainly impact.
Hatfield Shed
LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
Posts: 1728
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 3:34 pm

Re: LNER 2-10-2

Post by Hatfield Shed »

Remember that the rod the crank is clearing isn't static, it moves in synchrony: rod low, crank low; rod high, crank high (or even crosshead present, crank low; crosshead absent, crank high . Successful designs have operated in this way. For sure it needs custom cranking to each axle: but why else do we employ design draughtsmen? This project will keep them nicely occupied with geometry for a few weeks.

Another alternative is the divided rod that goes over and under the axle, but that tends to be heavy, only suitable for very slow machines.
Tonyaaa
NER Y7 0-4-0T
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2016 7:14 pm

Re: LNER 2-10-2

Post by Tonyaaa »

The reference to the photo in Railway World, was in the Apirl 1967 edition, published as an April fools day article, covering railway in the hidden European Country of Ruratiani.
User avatar
Atlantic 3279
LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
Posts: 6658
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 9:51 am
Location: 2850, 245

Re: LNER 2-10-2

Post by Atlantic 3279 »

What's more I understand the 2-10-2s are still at work in that backwater....
Most subjects, models and techniques covered in this thread are now listed in various categories on page1

Dec. 2018: Almost all images that disappeared from my own thread following loss of free remote hosting are now restored.
User avatar
52D
LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
Posts: 3968
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 3:50 pm
Location: Reallocated now between the Lickey and GWR
Contact:

Re: LNER 2-10-2

Post by 52D »

Tonyaaa wrote:The reference to the photo in Railway World, was in the Apirl 1967 edition, published as an April fools day article, covering railway in the hidden European Country of Ruratiani.
Ah yes it was on an Algrimpelstag special(The Turnip tossing festival) other shots in the article show a ten coupled loco heading for the border at Elsilrac
Hi interested in the area served by 52D. also researching colliery wagonways from same area.
Post Reply