LNER Locomotives that never were

This forum is for the discussion of the locomotives, motive power, and rolling stock of the LNER and its constituent companies.

Moderators: 52D, Tom F, Rlangham, Atlantic 3279, Blink Bonny, Saint Johnstoun, richard

User avatar
Saint Johnstoun
LNER A3 4-6-2
Posts: 1236
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 11:12 pm
Location: 63A - Scotland

Loco Drawings

Post by Saint Johnstoun »

Thanks for the encouragement - I have around 15000 images created on computer of locos, rolling stock, buses and trams - it's kept me amused for the last 10 years or so!

I have a lot of proper LNER locos covered, as well as the rival LMS organisation. Ask and it will be given unto you!

Although most of my bus and tram graphics are in full colour I've yet to launch out into liveries with the locos.
User avatar
brsince78
GNSR D40 4-4-0
Posts: 239
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2007 11:27 pm

Post by brsince78 »

You wouldn't happen to have a line drawing of the V4 Class by any chance?? My father is building a 3.5" guage live steam model.
User avatar
Saint Johnstoun
LNER A3 4-6-2
Posts: 1236
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 11:12 pm
Location: 63A - Scotland

V4

Post by Saint Johnstoun »

Two drawings of the V4 coming up shortly.
User avatar
Saint Johnstoun
LNER A3 4-6-2
Posts: 1236
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 11:12 pm
Location: 63A - Scotland

Proposed Diesel

Post by Saint Johnstoun »

This was the proposal with Beardmore engine using one of the Newport Shildon Electrics as a base.
Attachments
DE1.TIF
(184.82 KiB) Downloaded 238 times
User avatar
Saint Johnstoun
LNER A3 4-6-2
Posts: 1236
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 11:12 pm
Location: 63A - Scotland

What is it?

Post by Saint Johnstoun »

One for all you out there to give me an answer to.
Attachments
Z1B.TIF
?
(285.04 KiB) Downloaded 311 times
daveball
NER Y7 0-4-0T
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Apr 09, 2008 4:01 pm
Location: Bedford

Z1B

Post by daveball »

B1 proposal with an O6 (Stanier 8F) boiler?

I think I remember reading somewhere that on test, the thermal efficiency of a B1 compared quite well with an LMS or BR Standard 5MT; if that was the case then the complexity of the taper boiler and Belpaire firebox didn't add a lot. Presumably B1s were cheaper to build (and maintain?) than their LMS or BR equivalents, so I've been wondering would a range of smaller BR Standard locomotives based on Thompson/Peppercorn practice have been more cost effective?

Wonder what answer I'll get to that question on an LNER forum :)
David Ball
User avatar
richard
LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
Posts: 3390
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 5:11 pm
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas
Contact:

Post by richard »

Although the BR Exchange Trials have their critics, the Thompson B1 and Black 5 were well matched. Each performed slightly better in the other's territory!

The Black 5 was a 1930s design, compared to the simpler/cheaper wartime B1 - so you could probably argue that the B1 would have been more cost effective compared to the Standard Black 5.

For the mixed traffic tanks, then you'd be looking at the Thompson L1. These had their teething problems which would not have helped in the 1940s?


Richard
Richard Marsden
LNER Encyclopedia
User avatar
redtoon1892
GNR C1 4-4-2
Posts: 736
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 5:41 pm
Location: GATESHEAD
Contact:

Post by redtoon1892 »

No problem downloading the images here, like you say the C1 is a bit of an ugly duckling
hq1hitchin
LNER V2 2-6-2 'Green Arrow'
Posts: 1162
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 8:32 pm
Location: Newbury, Berks

Post by hq1hitchin »

The L1s were fine looking machines but had an unfortunate tendency to drop their motion at awkward times. Was it Hitchin men who christened them 'Concrete Mixers'?
A topper is proper if the train's a non-stopper!
User avatar
Saint Johnstoun
LNER A3 4-6-2
Posts: 1236
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 11:12 pm
Location: 63A - Scotland

B1 with BR No 3 boiler

Post by Saint Johnstoun »

By 1955, trouble with the original B1 boilers was being experienced with fracturing of the firebox plates and serious consideration was taken to fit the BR No. 3 boiler to these engines and Doncaster drawing office drew up the proposal. Before any authority was sought to rebuild any of the class remedial work on existing boilers had mostly solved the problem and the project was abandoned.
User avatar
silver fox
GCR O4 2-8-0 'ROD'
Posts: 535
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 11:51 pm
Location: 50A Clifton originally of 88A
Contact:

Post by silver fox »

You wouldn't have the full streamlined A4 I could decorate in to each of the 35?

I have tried doing trains, but couldn't work out the wheels, I found trucks dead easy!
Attachments
1-04A001.GIF
(11.8 KiB) Downloaded 200 times
10-04D010.GIF
(11.76 KiB) Downloaded 108 times
12-04A012.GIF
(10.35 KiB) Downloaded 72 times
18-04A018.GIF
(18.48 KiB) Downloaded 71 times
23-04A023.GIF
(14.96 KiB) Downloaded 145 times
By Mark t
http://www.youtube.com/yorksteam
(I was here first, with the space!)
wehf100
GCR D11 4-4-0 'Improved Director'
Posts: 486
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2007 3:42 pm
Location: Cambridgeshire

Post by wehf100 »

Interesting stuff, and bravo on the draughting skills.

It is always good to see how these plans one reads about might have turned out. The complete lack of drama in the 'semi-streamlined' A4 proposal certainly shows just what a publicity coup LNER achieved in the final engine!

I would be interested to see how LNER loco design would have gone if Robinson became CME, or any of the other pre-group NE companies for that matter. How would the NER Pacific dsign have developed in the 30's for instance?! Or would it- maybe they would have gone overhead electric in the 20's!

you can't beat an exercise counterfactual history

Will
User avatar
silver fox
GCR O4 2-8-0 'ROD'
Posts: 535
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 11:51 pm
Location: 50A Clifton originally of 88A
Contact:

Post by silver fox »

That's to point, the A4 might never have been for 2 reasons;

1)Robinson was the first choice, but being close to retirement, he sugested Gresley.

2)The A4 when tested in the wind tunnel had smoke pretruding in to the cab, so it was abandoned, but then for some reason it was retested, and it was found to be ok, after someone put his thumb print behind the chimney creating a little dimple.
By Mark t
http://www.youtube.com/yorksteam
(I was here first, with the space!)
hq1hitchin
LNER V2 2-6-2 'Green Arrow'
Posts: 1162
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 8:32 pm
Location: Newbury, Berks

Post by hq1hitchin »

and what would have happened if the LNER board had decided they were satisfied with the German plans for a high speed DMU service (like the Flying Hamburger) to run between KX and Newcastle.... and had Gresley not had the chance to show what an A3 could do in the way of high speed running?
A topper is proper if the train's a non-stopper!
User avatar
silver fox
GCR O4 2-8-0 'ROD'
Posts: 535
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 11:51 pm
Location: 50A Clifton originally of 88A
Contact:

Post by silver fox »

nowt.
Last edited by silver fox on Mon Apr 14, 2008 8:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
By Mark t
http://www.youtube.com/yorksteam
(I was here first, with the space!)
Post Reply